I have been listening to all the talking heads arguing over how best to proceed with the impeachment of Donald Trump and, for the most part, they are saying exactly what I had expected: they are arguing strictly along the lines of what is most politically expedient for their respective Party interests. This saddens me because no one is approaching this impeachment from the perspective of principle: where we do what is right, cling to the rule of law, and leave the results to Providence. But so few voices are arguing for this approach, and of those who are, none of them seem to hold any position of prominence or leadership. It has all left me wondering just how many of us are left that really, truly understand the founding of this nation, let alone the men who built it. I think, were the Founders alive today, they may well be pushing — not for the reparation of this nation — but for its dissolution!
Yes, I mean exactly what I just said: I think the time has come where the Founders would have agreed that it is time to make the moral case for dissolving the union. When even those who claim to support and defend our founding principles are wavering over whether or not we should proceed to a full trial in the Senate, where we can fully expose the breadth and depth of the corruption in our government and political Parties, and then trust the Lord to handle the result, then the nation is already lost. I say that we’re already lost because, if we are all looking to our ourselves to ‘save us,’ then we no longer hold any resemblance to the Founders or their principles, which means we have no chance of properly applying their principles and ideals for self-governance. Rather, we have arrived at the point where — sadly — we actually do need masters to rule over us. Therefore, if the few people left among us who are still trying to cling to liberty are not to be trampled by the tyranny growing in the rest of this nation, the only solution I can see is to dissolve the Union and leave the people of those few remaining Liberty-loving States to their own devices.
Anything less than a dissolution will represent an open tyranny with those who now look to men for their solutions trampling over the remnant who still looks to the Creator for their laws and salvation. It all boils down to the same question our Founders faced: will we be governed by the Lord and His Laws, or will we be governed by men and their bayonets?
Currently, as it appears now, unless we dissolve for the sake of the few, then we will all fall under the bayoneted. I pray I am wrong, but, unfortunately, everything I know about Natural Law, human nature and the march of human history tells me I am anything but…
What can Snoopy and the Red Barron teach us about the way this impeachment process is going?
For the sake of argument, let’s pretend we got into a big fight over who should win: Snoopy, or the Red Barron? Now, don’t assume you know which side would win in a fair fight here. I mean, have you seen the cartoons? Snoopy cheats, and nobody wants to let anyone get away with cheating. Yes, that’s right: I am saying Snoopy cannot be trusted because he cheats. In fact, Snoopy is so dangerous, we cannot allow Snoopy to even take to the air. We simply cannot take that chance that he would cheat — again. Protecting ‘fairness’ is just too important. Therefore, we must smash Snoopy’s dog house — in the interest of making sure everything stays ‘fair.’
Here, I’ll even provide you with irrefutable evidence that proves — beyond any doubt — that Snoopy cheats. In this video, we see that Snoopy and his minions not only rely on cheating, they lack any sense of chivalry and fair play whatsoever. In fact, they are so bad, they not only cheat in a fair fight, but they kidnap the woman that the Red Barron was trying to protect:
Now that you have seen the evidence for yourself, let’s be honest with each other: Snoopy is such a bad person that, in the interest of fairness and protecting women, we must smash Snoopy’s dog house — so he can never do anything like this again.
Now that you have seen the proof, do you agree that we have to smash Snoopy’s dog house to protect ‘fairness’ and women? If you disagree, then you’re a ‘fill in the blank.’ I mean, seriously: I gave you the proof in that video, so, if you don’t agree with me, you have to be a ‘fill in the blank.’ Only a ‘fill in the blank‘ would try to defend Snoopy’s cheating and kidnapping of women.
OK, so, what does this have to do with the impeachment process? Well,the first thing we need to understand is that, depending on which side you might have been on in WW I, either Snoopy or the Red Barron could be the ‘good’ guy or ‘bad’ guy. If you were a German, then Snoopy would most likely be the ‘bad’ guy in your eyes, which means Snoopy’s attack on the Red Barron using everything and anything but his guns in a fair fight represents ‘cheating.’ However, if you were on the Allied side, then you might see the Red Barron as the ‘bad’ guy, and that Snoopy has no guns, so he was defending himself with whatever means he has available to him. Which leaves us with the fight, itself. In the background here is the implication of right and wrong in connection to the entire struggle we know as WW I. Here again, the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ guys all depends on which side of the line you stand.
I hope you will see that I am using the story of Snoopy and the Red Barron as an allegory. Before I connect all this to the impeachment hearings, let me explain the characters/parallels in this little allegory I just created (you know, just in case someone out there missed it 🙂 ):
Snoopy represents President Trump.
The Red Barron represents the American Left.
The Red Barron’s guns represent the American Left’s ideas of ‘fair play.’
Snoopy’s Dog House represents the 202 election.
The fight (essentially WW I) represents the rule of law.
Now, let me connect the dots for you:
I deliberately set this up in a way that claims Snoopy is the ‘bad’ guy and the Barron is the ‘good’ guy. I said Snoopy cheats, because he does not use guns and that the only way we can make things fair is to destroy Snoopy’s dog house. In our allegory, this is the same thing as saying that Snoopy (Trump) is not playing by the Barron’s (Left’s) rules by using guns (the Left’s rules of ‘fairness’/rule of law), therefore, ‘fairness’ demands that we destroy Snoopy’s dog house (the election). And behind all of this is the question of who will win WW I (the rule of law, or those who oppose the rule of law). Now, which side you are on — Snoopy’s or the Barron’s — will decide how you see this issue. But, before you decide, consider that the American Left, the people who are always talking about how much they love ‘democracy,’ is now saying we cannot trust ‘democracy:’
Using our allegory, let’s look at this issue. Which side started WW I? The Germans (The Red Barron’s side). Which side was morally wrong in WW I? The Germans (again, the Red Barron’s side). So, if WW I represents the rule of law, and the Red Barron represents the side opposing the rule of law, this means that — at the very least — by saying they cannot trust the election, the American Left is trampling the rule of law.
This leaves us with only one question: does Snoopy really cheat simply because he does not play by the rules dictated by the Red Barron? Well, in a war, only a fool allows his enemy to dictate how he fights — especially when that enemy is the aggressor (i.e. the morally wrong side of the war). So, let’s stop demanding that Trump play by Democrat rules. What matters is this: did Trump violate the rule of law — period? And the answer to that — given everything we know — is NO! Unless they can prove that Trump was only interested in himself, then everything he has done in Ukraine is mandated by the law. That means Trump was obeying/following/enforcing the law, not violating it. Which means that Snoopy is not a cheater — the Red Barron is!
So, the IG report dealing with the FISA investigation in to the allegations that Trump colluded with Russia is out, and it claims the IG found ‘No evidence of bias.’ Well, let’s just apply a little logic to that, shall we?
First, the IG’s own report shows that the FISA warrant that started the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign was entirely based on the Steel dossier. Furthermore, the IG reports that the Steel dossier was a complete fabrication, and that it was paid for by the Hillary Clinton Campaign. What’s more, one of the people inside the FBI investigation stated that there was clear evidence of political bias behind the dossier. Finally, the IG’s report shows that the FBI not only knew they were committing a fraud upon the FISA court when they first applied for the warrant, but that they withheld exculpatory evidence and even went so far as to fabricate evidence to continue the warrant. Yet, with all of this, the IG refers to these deliberate and illegal acts by the FBI as ‘mistakes.’
But how can they be simple ‘mistakes’ when they all work to the benefit of one person/Party and against another person/Party. Maybe, if we only had a few such ‘mistakes,’ the IG could make such a case, but we have seventeen separate ‘mistakes.’ In legal terms, this is not called a ‘mistake,’ but a pattern, and patterns imply intent — especially when people inside the investigation are stating their is political bias, and the people running the investigation are fabricating evidence to continue their illegal activity. Therefore, we have only one of two choices: either this pattern indicates a systemic practice within the FBI, or it indicates political bias.
So, which is it: how do we decide. Well, this one is actually pretty easy. If this pattern is indicative of the standard operating practices within the FBI and DOJ under the Obama Administration, the IG should have found indications that they same things were being done to Democrat candidates. However, the IG found just the opposite. According to the IG report, the FBI operated properly, if not deferentially toward the Clinton Campaign, but they acted inappropriately toward the Trump Campaign. This makes it clear that this series of ‘mistakes’ was not standard procedure for the FBI and DOJ under the Obama Administration, which leaves only one other reasonable option: political bias.
Now, before I keep going, let me stop right here and state this as forcefully as I can:
These were not mistakes!
Mistakes of this nature seldom — if ever — happen at this level and, if they do, they are caught and corrected. They do not compound. Furthermore, the deliberate fabrication of evidence is not a mistake, it is an intentional criminal act. So, please, do not try to argue that this is all just incompetence. The IG’s report actually shows that it was not. How do we know this? Because the IG’s report condemns the Obama FBI and DOJ, yet the Democrats in these hearings are not contesting the IG’s findings. That is an admission that they are accurate, which shows the FBI acted willfully.
Now, there is one thing left to consider here. If, given everything we have just discussed, the Ig still says he cannot see political bias in this entire scandal, then we have to consider two additional possibilities: that the IG is the one who is incompetent, or that the IG is also acting from political bias: in this case, the desire to provide cover for the Obama Administration by giving the Democrats and the media “No bias’ talking points. So, how can we determine which is which? Well, I’ll leave that up to you but, if you need help figuring it out, consider this:
The media largely skipped all Republican commentary and questioning today, but they covered several Democrats repeatedly asking the IG is he found bias and the IG saying, “No bias.”
Certainly, that proves bias in the media, which is now proven to coordinate with the Democrats. Which then leaves the reader to decide whether or not the IG is part of this coup, or is he just an incompetent boob who some how managed to rise to the highest levels of our legal system?
So, I have been saying I will be voting for Trump in 202, but not for any political reasons, but to simply buy time for the believers to reach as many of the lost as possible before the curtain falls forever on the United States. Well, today, Rush Limbaugh — someone who I have come to hold suspect, himself — gave me a solid political reason to vote for President Trump!
I am not sure how many caught it today, but Rush actually admitted that the NWO is real, that it is international in scope and that it has been running this country from behind the scenes for decades! Now, he did not use those words exactly, but, if you can ‘read the stitches on a fast ball,’ then this is most certainly what he said. Here’ I’ll lay it out for you.
He started by addressing a fear that I have, myself: namely, that, if Barr doesn’t get busy handing our indictments, and Trump is not re-elected, the clock is going to run out on any opportunity we have to see justice metered out to the Democrats and the criminals in the FBI, DOJ, CIA and State Department. Like many others who longer trust anyone in our government, I had started to suspect Barr is part of the Deep State and was playing a ‘slow roll’ on us: promising action until it is too late to do anything then just going away and nothing happens. Well, Rush suggested something I had not considered.
If Rush is correct (and he could be, as he does know the inside politics on these matters), then Barr and Durham could be taking extra special care to cross every conceivable ‘T‘ and dot every imaginable ‘I‘ because they not only intend to take on the Deep State, but the puppet masters behind the faces and names we know. Yes, Limbaugh actually said that Barr and Durham are going after the money men behind the Deep State; the people in the shadows who’s names we do not know. Then Limbaugh said that Barr and Durham have to be careful because, if they do not do this right, they are dead — and in the context and with the tone he used those words, it seemed clear that Rush mean dead — as in, ‘assume room temperature!‘
Now, do you realize what this little mini-monologue actually means? In case you’re not sure, or that fast ball went by too fast, let me lay it out nice and slow:
1 — Rush just admitted that there is a NWO, that it is International in scope, and that the Deep State is part of it.
2 — Rush also admitted that all these jokes about people being ‘suicided‘ for crossing the Deep State are not just ‘conspiracy theory.’
and
3 — President Trump intends to bur this whole cabal to the ground.
My dear reader, this is one of those days when — if you know how to read him — Rush let’s you peak behind the curtain, and what he showed us is at once frightening and encouraging. It confirms what so many of us have known for years but couldn’t get anyone ‘in the know‘ to admit. It also confirms that this nation is in grave danger from a subversive element within our own government, media and education system. But it also tells us that we may finally have a true patriot in office who is not part of the system and who is willing to do what must be done to save this nation.
If this is true, then it is the first time in my lifetime that I have seen a true ray of hope. Not even the great ‘Renaldus Magnus’ gave us such hope. Therefore, while I cannot speak for anyone else, I can and will say that, barring something truly earthshaking and undeniably clear as to its truth, I will be voting for President Trump. He is going to need all the help he can get.
BUT WITH THAT SAID: This is not the time to put our hope and faith in a man, but the time to return to the formula which brought this nation is success in the first place. It is time to turn, repent and seek forgiveness for our wrong-doing and lawlessness. As a nation, we need to pray to the Lord for forgiveness and for Divine protection over this President and those around him. It may even be time to call for national days of fasting again. But the last thing we should do is trust in Trump. This nation — if it is to survive — must always trust in the Lord and then do its best to live by His laws. Anything else will lead to destruction because nothing else will work.
With the growing encroachment on our 2nd Amendment Right to maintain the ability to resist tyrannical government, I think this post is well timed. Do with it as you will:
I was once sitting at a biker’s bar with some friends. We got into a conversation about how it will be impossible to resist the government when they move to disarm the nation and take over. One of the younger folks at our table said we could not resist because we couldn’t even organize ourselves, let alone learn to fight effectively.
When this young man said those words, I stood up, raised my voice, and things went a little like this from that point:
Me: “Hey! This kid says we won’t be able to resist a government take over because the People can’t organize in time to resist them. How many of you here were in the military?”
Biker: (this guy was BIG). “Who said that?”
Me: “This young man right here” (I point to the guy at our table).
Biker: (turns to look around the bar) “How many officers we got here?” (a couple hands went up).
“NCO’s?” (a half dozen hands went up).
(The biker looked around at everyone else and said) “The rest of you are privates. Fall in and do what these men tell you to do.”
(Then he looked at the young man with my table and said) “We’re formed. Any more dumb questions?”
Folks, this is how easy it is to form a militia. It just takes a group of people who are serious about organizing and fighting for their rights. The rest has already been done.
NOTE TO FORMER MILITARY: I do not discount your rank, but, if and when the time comes, you vets who were in the Air Force and the Navy need to remember that we’re talking small unit tactics here. While you may out rank them, Most your brothers and sisters from the Army and Marines in your local group are going to have had training and experience far better suited to the mission at hand than you did. Remember that. Use their skills appropriately. It may be that some field promotions will be in order.
