APPLIED NATURAL LAW: The Proper Way to Advocate for Change

In my last few posts, I have argued that the government has a duty to protect every citizen equally, and the support and preserve the world view upon which that government is built.  This is all part of the Social Contract.  In the U.S., we know this Social Contract as The U.S. Constitution.  However, in … Continue reading APPLIED NATURAL LAW: The Proper Way to Advocate for Change

Advertisements

APPLIED NATURAL LAW: The Proper Role of Govt. in Public Institutions

In my last post, I argued that, under Natural Law, the government has a duty to support, preserve and defend the world view upon which it is built.  In this post, I will argue for the way the government can properly do this without violating the Principles of Natural Law. The first thing we need … Continue reading APPLIED NATURAL LAW: The Proper Role of Govt. in Public Institutions

APPLIED LOGIC: The Notion of ‘Law’ and Its Implications for Secular Humanism

I'd like to start this post by explaining what I understand the term, 'secular humanism,' to mean.  As I understand the idea (from reading the works of self-described secular humanists), the theory encapsulates a body of thinkers who embrace human reason and mankind's ability to perfect himself -- especially society -- through reason, especially through … Continue reading APPLIED LOGIC: The Notion of ‘Law’ and Its Implications for Secular Humanism

POINTS TO PONDER: The ‘Conspiracy’ We Know as the ‘Progressive’ Movement

In my first post in this series, POINTS TO PONDER: Does the Progressive Agenda Violate the ‘Separations Clause?’, I attempt to help readers see that the Progressive movement is religious in nature: one just has to understand the roots of Progressive ideology before one begins to see how this is true.  In this post, I will … Continue reading POINTS TO PONDER: The ‘Conspiracy’ We Know as the ‘Progressive’ Movement

OBJECTIONS TO ORIGINAL INTENT: The Founders never Intended to Allow Ownership of Cannons and Tanks

One of the most frequent arguments for 'gun control*' is that the Founders would never have allowed private ownership of something like a cannon, battleship or tank.  The problem with this claim is that they did allow private ownership of cannons and battleships.  Therefore, it is unlikely that they would have denied private ownership of … Continue reading OBJECTIONS TO ORIGINAL INTENT: The Founders never Intended to Allow Ownership of Cannons and Tanks

ORIGINAL INTENT: The Militia is Independent of the Government

Having established that the Founders defined the militia as the whole of the People and not the army (or National Guard), let us now consider whether or not the militia is under the control of the government.  And if so, to what extent does the government's control extend over the militia?  We'll start by remembering … Continue reading ORIGINAL INTENT: The Militia is Independent of the Government

LESSONS IN LOGIC: THE AMERICAN LEFT IS GUILTY OF TREASON/SEDITION!

I have had enough of the lies in the American media.  The political 'Left' in America is now in an open state of war against this nation and this can be proven beyond any reasonable objection.  All one needs to do is look at what is happening in America today and then apply some simple … Continue reading LESSONS IN LOGIC: THE AMERICAN LEFT IS GUILTY OF TREASON/SEDITION!