Category Archives: LESSONS IN LOGIC

LESSONS IN LOGIC, THE FOUNDING IDEALS

The Slippery Slope Of ‘Democracy’

1 Comment

This post is a two-fer (two lessons in one post).

Read this story, then we’ll chat:

Opinion: Republicans in Texas just voted to reject democracy

OK, finished? I hope so because, if you didn’t bother to read the article, what follows will be largely lost on you.

First, did you notice that the whole article was written with what is known in logic as, ‘loaded language?‘ Well, that is a fallacy. So, in spite of the fact that this piece is labeled as ‘opinion,’ it is — in fact — propaganda. I say this because it is ‘opinion’ promoted by the State-aligned media. [Notice how I wrote State-aligned instead of State-controlled? Yeah, I did that so no one could accuse me of using loaded language, as it has been clearly shown that CNN is aligned with the agenda of the American Left, making my statement one of fact and not opinion.]

This propaganda piece is also known as ‘The Slippery Slope.’ This is yet another fallacy. What happens here is, when the GOP democratically votes to do something within its Party, the Left claims it is a threat to democracy in general. A reasonable person would not only notice that there is absolutely no reason to accept the claim that a Party voting on its platform/direction is not a threat to a nation doing the same, the reasonable person would also notice that it is the author — not the Party — who is threatening democracy. he does so in two ways:

1 — He denies the Party its right to vote however its membership desires.

2 — It asserts that questioning clearly questionable election results is a threat in itself.

Both are a threat to democracy! First, a Party that is not free to set its own agenda by democratic vote is attacking democracy. Second, not being able to demand proof that an election was not rigged is an attack on democracy. The author has done both, then accuses the people questioning his Party of being the threat. At least, the author is truthful here: challenging his Party is a threat — to the author’s Party! And, in this case, rightfully so.

Now, setting aside the fact that this nation is not, never was and — YHWH willing — never will be a ‘democracy,’ let’s look at where the spirit of ‘democracy’ comes. Is it of YHWH, or of Satan?

By definition, ‘democracy’ encompasses the notion of ‘majority rule.’ Well, our Founders called this, ‘The Tyranny of the Masses,’ and they were right to do so. You see, the masses represent this world, or, at the very least, the way the world thinks. But YHWH tells His people not to be part of the masses. He says to be in/among them, but not to conform to them:

Romans 12:2 New American Standard Bible

2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.

In short: the masses do not and will never advocate for the things YHWH says are good and right and acceptable to Him. Therefore, advocating for ‘democracy’ is to advocate for Satan! Yes! You read that correctly, and I mean it — because it is 100% FACT!

After all, the masses ‘voted’ to execute an innocent man:

Mark 15:13-15 New American Standard Bible

3 They shouted back, “Crucify Him!” 14 But Pilate said to them, “Why, what evil has He done?” But they shouted all the more, “Crucify Him!” 15 Intent on satisfying the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas for them, and after having Jesus flogged, he handed Him over to be crucified.

Tell me, how is Pilot executing a man he knows is innocent simply to satisfy the crowed any different from our Government allowing BLM and ANTIFA to murder and destroy — simply to satisfy the masses?

What! You say ANTIFA and BLM are not the majority? Are you sure? After all, the same people telling you the election was not rigged are the ones telling you that ANTIFA and BLM represent the majority of Americans. You believe them about the election, so why not believe them when it comes to everything they tell you to believe?

Oh! And one more thing: if you think the religious stuff in this post has nothing to do with our founding ideals… Well, congratulations, you are in the ‘majority’ opinion. If that makes you feel good — makes you feel you are correct — then you are ‘of the world.’ Now how do you feel about ‘democracy’? 🙂

POLITICS, Propaganda, SOCIAL ENGINEERING

THIS Is How We Hit Back, Folks

1 Comment

Be careful with all the fake propaganda stories out there about Disney and DeSantis. If Disney looses its special protections, it will not cost Floridians billions in new taxes. This is something the Progressives are pushing to try and scare people — as usual. The truth is, if Disney looses its special protections, it will finally have to play on a level playing field — which will also mean more tax revenues to local municipalities. If that does not result in tax savings for Floridians, it will only be because they are still electing Progressives and not principle statesmen like DeSantis!

Here, give this a read, as it is a very clear and factual explanation of what is happening:

Did Disney Bite Off More Than It Could Chew With DeSantis?

LEARN FROM HIS EXAMPLE

For all those would-be political types out there: this is what real Americans have been wanting for decades, and DeSantis is showing you all how to do it. Don’t just talk about pushing back and make a fake show of having tried to do something, actually do it! Use the law and the proper powers of government to not only stop, but punish the minority of people who have been forcing their political agendas down the nation’s throat for decades! And make it hurt. These corporations have been allowed to say and do what they want for far too long. Let them keep doing it, just start making them pay the price for it.

OH! And in case you want-to-be political types are worried about how you will be treated by the voters if you actually do what the voters want you to do: look at how DeSantis is being treated. He may well be a more popular political rock star than Trump. Just look at how much support he has in Florida. He turned us from purple to hard red in just a couple years. Just think of what we could do with a nation filled with leaders like him.

APPLIED LOGIC, CONSPIRACY THEORY, LESSONS IN LOGIC

Occam’s Razor, the Globalist Agenda and Left-Wing Destruction of America

2 Comments

I assume that — by now — most all Americans have heard of Occam’s Razor. If not, in a nutshell, it is a logical principle which states:

“All things being equal, the simplest solution is usually the correct one.”

The classic example of how Occam’s Razor works is:

“If you are hearing hoof-beats, think horse, not zebra.”

It has become common to see people using Occam’s Razor to dismiss opposition they do not like, or which damages their agenda. This is especially true when it is cited in conjunction with opposition to supposed ‘Conspiracy Theory.’ However, most of the people citing it do not apply Occam’s Razor correctly; they leave out one critical precept of the maxim. If you’ll give me a few minutes, I will do my best to explain.

The problem is found in the first and most crucial point of the maxim:

“All things being equal…”

So, assuming our example of hearing hoof-beats:

IF we are in the U.S., then the example I stated above is an accurate application of Occam’s Razor — unless I happen to be in a U.S. zoo, or game preserve that keeps zebras.

You see, very, very few people bother to establish that the things being compared are equal before appealing to Occam’s Razor. When this happens, they are not making a rational argument. In fact, they are committing a fallacy, a mistake in logic. By definition, this is an irrational act.

Occam’s Razor stipulates ‘all things must be equal.’ So, what does, ‘all things being equal,’ mean? Well, in common language, it means you have to prove you are comparing apples to apples. Here, let me give you another example you might have seen used in the news. It takes many forms, but they usually go something like this:

“Occam’s Razor dictates that the simpler answer to — insert ‘Conspiracy Theory’ here — is stupidity, not conspiracy.”

[NOTE: this is actually amodified appeal to a sub-set of Occam’s Razor known as Hanlon’s Razor.]

OK, now, let’s take the most obvious target of such a refutation of ‘Conspiracy Theory:’ the New World Order. The claim is that we should never assign evil intent to anything that can be explained by simple stupidity, such as the New World Order ‘Conspiracy Theorists.’ But there’s a problem with using Occam’s Razor to dismiss claims about the NWO. In fact, there are two problems.

First, you must make sure every aspect of the two things being considered are actually equal. In this case, those two things that are claimed are ‘conspiracy’ and ‘stupidity.’ But this is not what is actually being compared. You see, the claim that there is a group of people working to force a NWO on the world is not a theory. It is fact. The people pushing the NWO have not made themselves secret: they have been very open about their goal and their plans to achieve it. They just boasted about it this past week:

Therefore, ‘all things’ are not equal, and the people who purport to use Occam’s Razor to ‘debunk’ assertions about the NWO are not only committing the fallacy of equivocation (comparing apples to oranges), they are also appealing to ignorance (counting on the fact that their audience will not understand the trick they are playing on them).

But there is another fallacy contained in this modified use of Occam;s Razor. There is no truth in the claim that we should choose stupidity over malice/conspiracy. In fact, I would argue the exact opposite is true. Therefore, to use Hanlon’s Razor in citing Occam’s Razor against NWO assertions, as many as three fallacies are being committed.

If you understand logic, this is enough to make you laugh at the person committing these fallacies as they have just demonstrated they are either stupid, or exhibiting malice — which means they have actually refuted themselves, not the claims about the NWO! 🙂

APPLYING THIS TO ANOTHER CURRENT EVENT:

There are consistent claims that the American Left is actively working to destroy this country. Many in the media — on both sides — will claim Occam’s Razor to ‘debunk’ these assertions. But is this actually an accurate use of Occam’s Razor? Let’s look at the first precept: is everything equal? Start by asking yourself these questions:

First, has anyone on the Left ever said they want to destroy, remake or fundamentally transform the country?

Next, can a ‘stupid’ person win office without — at the very least — being helped by a ‘smart’ person?

If a ‘stupid’ person needs and receives help from a ‘smart’ person, then who is likely to be in control of the ‘stupid’ person after they win their election?

Then, do all of the programs the Left shuts down have a net positive or negative effect on the health of the nation and its economy?

And, do all the programs the Left forces have a net positive or negative effect on the health of the nation and its economy?

Finally, is there any indication that the refused and forced policies work together or align with a single agenda? Put another way: do they show actual forethought and coordination?

Now, do the math: is there more evidence of simple stupidity, or intentional planning? If you find more evidence of simple stupidity, then why do people vote for those stupid people unless they are just as stupid (or worse, more stupid)? However, if you find the preponderance of the evidence indicates some level of planning and coordination, then Occam’s Razor actually dictates malice/conspiracy — not stupidity! And those who use Occam’s Razor to dismiss anyone trying to point out the evidence are committing logical fallacies. And, if they are intentionally arguing a fallacy, the next thing you have to do is decide:

Is that person stupid, or are they a part of the malice/conspiracy?

See why I love logic? When applied properly, it usually exonerates the innocent and bites bites stupidity/malice/conspiracy in the rear-end! LOL 🙂

LESSONS IN LOGIC

The ‘Bigger Picture’ Behind The Twitter-Babylon Bee-Rachel Levin Story

2 Comments

I will try to make this as short and easy to understand as possible. We will start with the story about Twitter banning the Babylon Bee:

Babylon Bee founder and Not the Bee CEO Adam Ford has been locked out of Twitter for sharing a Babylon Bee joke calling Rachel Levine a male

OK, now, the first thing I want to do is walk you through the logic here. Let’s just follow science — and by that, I mean real science — by remembering some basic biology we should have all learned about from our days in those government indoctrination camps commonly called ‘the public school system:’

XX chromosomes = FEMALE!

XY chromosomes = MALE!

Period — end of discussion (unless you are irrational, delusional or depraved)

Therefore, all rational people recognize that — no matter what he does to our injects into his body, or how he dresses, this is a male!

This means that Twitter has punished the Babylon Bee for making an observation that is true by definition!

Now, for those who do not know logic, it is utterly irrational to argue with a definition. If you do so, you demonstrate to the world, by your own actions, that you have renounced the use of reason, which — according to most of those who do this — excludes you from the majority of definitions of ‘human.’ If we could cross-examine them and get honest answers from them, I suspect this is exactly what we would find: that the people running twitter have just excluded themselves from their own definition of ‘human.’

OK, that was actually the fun (i.e. snide, mocking) part of this post. Now,

HERE IS THE PART TO WHICH YOU NEED TO PAY ATTENTION!

A definition is an un-breakable rule of logic. If something is true ‘by definition,’ then it is true — period. No one can claim differently and still be operating inside the rule of logic and reason.

To claim that a man is a woman simply because he says he is a woman is a contradiction of definitions. Even if he has surgery and injects hormones to alter his body, he is still a man. He still has XY chromosomes. Therefore, by definition, he is a male! Asserting that a man is actually a woman is a contradiction — again, that is also by definition:

contradiction (ˌkɒntrəˈdɪkʃən) n

1. the act of going against; opposition; denial

2. a declaration of the opposite or contrary

3. a statement that is at variance with itself (often in the phrase a contradiction in terms)

4. conflict or inconsistency, as between events, qualities, etc

5. a person or thing containing conflicting qualities

6. (Logic) logic a statement that is false under all circumstances; necessary falsehood

In logic, a contradiction is also known as an absurdity. I know it gets old, but — by definition:

absurdity noun

1. The state or quality of being absurd or inconsistent with obvious truth, reason, or sound judgment; want of rationality or common sense: as, the absurdity of superstition; absurdity of conduct.

2. That which is absurd; an absurd action, statement, argument, custom, etc.: as, the absurdities of men; your explanation involves a gross absurdity.

Now, in logic, we have a saying:

“From an absurdity, all things follow.”

That means, once a person convinces you to believe an absurdity, then literally anything and everything becomes true. Now, I want you to pay close attention to this next quote, because the man who said these words was in the same exact wheelhouse we’re in now, and he was driving at the very same point I am trying to make:

“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

–Voltaire

For those who may need help connecting the dots here, the people who tell you a man can become a woman are the very same people who convinced a great many of our neighbors, friends and family to demand lock-downs, experimental jabs, the destruction of our economy, etc…. They can convince you that it is not only a ‘moral’ thing to teach 5 year olds about sex, but that it is perfectly normal for them to have relations with adults. They can tell you that the un-born child is not a person until they are actually 3 years old, and that it is not murder to kill them up to that age (don’t balk, one of the leading ‘medical ethicists’ in the U.S. has made that very argument). In fact, if they can convince you that a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man, then they can convince you that all lives are not equal, and that white lives are actually inferior — and that they hold the moral high ground for saying so. All of the things we’ve seen coming from these people represent lawlessness, chaos and destruction, and they are all atrocities!

But there is an even greater point to be made here. The people who are pushing others to commit these atrocities believe that the ends they seek justify whatever means they need to achieve them. In other words, they do not see any moral problems with whatever atrocities they cause or commit — just as long as they achieve their goals. In fact, many of these people believe that the ‘moral’ thing to do is to kill off some 7.4 billion people. You see, if a man can become a woman, then that’s not murder, its ‘saving the planet.’ And, no, I am not exaggerating. There are people who have argued this point and are currently working toward this goal.

This brings us to another quote by another philosopher who also understood everything we’re discussing here:

“If god does not exist everything is permitted.”

– Dostoevsky

Yes, for those of you with the sharper pencils in the class, I am saying that the people pushing these absurdities on society are Godless. In fact, many of them openly assert that there is no God. Sadly, they do not realize that the claim that there is no God is — itself — an absurdity. But then there are those depraved individuals who push absurdity and promote atrocity who would claim they most certainly do believe in god. Sadly, they are correct. It’s just that the god they worship is themselves (and, yes, that’s right: this is yet another absurdity).

I suppose no one said it better than this man:

Romans 1:28

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a depraved mind, to do those things that are not proper,

(It’s actually a part of Natural Law, folks, which puts it square in the focus of this blog 😉 )

**********************************

A PERSONAL REQUEST

I have a personal aversion to self-promotion. It is the primary reason I have not yet started a video or pod cast. So, if you find this post to be of any value in helping you to better understand our world, or to make sense out of the events of the day, please like it and share it with your friends. Thank you, B3A

Eugenics, HISTORY, Propaganda, Science, SOCIAL ENGINEERING, The Progressives

Hitler Proclaims Anyone Who Attacks Him Is Attacking Science

The first thought I had when I saw this story from The Babylon Bee was:

I hope people won’t dismiss this!

Here is the story, and an excerpt from it:

Hitler Proclaims Anyone Who Attacks Him Is Attacking Science

BERLIN—In an interview with CBS News, German Chancellor Adolf Hitler declared that anyone who attacks him or his methods is really attacking science itself.

“Why do you think all these mean, angry people are attacking you with nasty words?” said the starstruck CBS interviewer. “Is it because they are dumb and stupid and don’t understand your brilliance?”

“It’s clear why people are attacking me. They hate science,” said Hitler. “The science of Darwinian evolution and eugenics as an effective mechanism for the betterment of humankind is completely undisputed. The science is settled. It’s clear what motivates the people who question my methods. They are just anti-science bigots.”

The CBS interviewer nodded solemnly in agreement. “Hmmm. Anti-science bigots. So true,” she replied. 

The Babylon Bee is a Christian satire web site, but it’s work often contains an uncomfortable amount of truth. This piece is one of those where the truth is so blatant that I would hesitate to call this story satire. To me — and to others who actually know the true history here — this is factually connecting the past to the present. Let me quote another section from the Bee’s post, then I’ll explain why I am saying all of this with such certainty:

Experts confirmed that eugenics is supported by peer-reviewed scientific research and that every major scientific institution in the early 20th century currently endorses it as the most scientific path forward for mankind.

That is not satire. That is an absolute truth — as it would have been stated by an early 20th Century Eugenicist! The part of this Babylon Bee post that so many people do not know or understand is that the Holocaust was rooted in the Eugenics movement. It started with the T-4 program. But Hitler learned the idea of Eugenics (i.e. ‘scientific’ breeding of a master race) from Americans:

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics

Nor do they know that the American Eugenics movement is connected to the American Progressive movement:

Eugenics: The hidden history of the progressive movement

Or that the American Progressives of the early 20th Century are the same Democrats who have been forcing their agenda down our throats today:

“Early 20th Century Progressive”, Hillary Proudly Proclaimed To The World — You Remember?

This is why the American Progressives (which includes the leadership of the GOP) supports Planned Parenthood so strongly:

Margaret Sanger Eugenics (The truth about Planned Parenthood and Hitler) – PART 1

Planned Parenthood is the connection between the past and the present:

BILL GATES’ FATHER RAN PLANNED PARENTHOOD, HIS MOTHER CREATED MICROSOFT, TOGETHER THEY TRAINED THEIR SON TO SPREAD THE GOSPEL OF EUGENICS

And now, I hear Hitler’s voice speaking Fauci’s words, and I see the whole stroke of the Progressive/Eugenics/Holocaust history from the early 20th Century through today plating our before me in one scene.

That is why I would not dismiss The Babylon Bee’s story: because it isn’t satire, IT’S TRUTH!

**************************************

BTW: Al Gore once gave an interview in which he suggested that ‘conservative’ and ‘religious’ people were somehow defective, and that ‘They’ would soon be able to identify genetic markers of who is likely to be ‘conservative’ or ‘religious’ while they are still in the womb! Do the math on that one, people: there is only one reason to test for such things before a child is born. ‘They’ are looking for ways to eliminate the troublesome parts of humanity: the parts who will oppose ‘Their’ agenda.

Now, that video was scrubbed from the internet, but you will still find reflections or shadows of it — if you look. I posted about it. So did Glenn Beck. Others did, as well. In our posts, we all mention the same things, but when you click on the links to the video, the video is gone. This way, ‘They’ can say we are lying, but that doesn’t make their case. In fact, it affirms the claims of those who say Al Gore is seeking to kill unborn opponents to his political agenda. It affirms it because so many people have told you he said it, then the video is removed. Well, if he didn’t say it, leave the video in place: it will testify for itself. By removing it, you just acknowledge that the claims have merit.

The point is this:

American Eugenicists are still trying to ‘scientifically engineer’ a super race/society.