The ‘Bigger Picture’ Behind The Twitter-Babylon Bee-Rachel Levin Story

I will try to make this as short and easy to understand as possible. We will start with the story about Twitter banning the Babylon Bee:

Babylon Bee founder and Not the Bee CEO Adam Ford has been locked out of Twitter for sharing a Babylon Bee joke calling Rachel Levine a male

OK, now, the first thing I want to do is walk you through the logic here. Let’s just follow science — and by that, I mean real science — by remembering some basic biology we should have all learned about from our days in those government indoctrination camps commonly called ‘the public school system:’

XX chromosomes = FEMALE!

XY chromosomes = MALE!

Period — end of discussion (unless you are irrational, delusional or depraved)

Therefore, all rational people recognize that — no matter what he does to our injects into his body, or how he dresses, this is a male!

This means that Twitter has punished the Babylon Bee for making an observation that is true by definition!

Now, for those who do not know logic, it is utterly irrational to argue with a definition. If you do so, you demonstrate to the world, by your own actions, that you have renounced the use of reason, which — according to most of those who do this — excludes you from the majority of definitions of ‘human.’ If we could cross-examine them and get honest answers from them, I suspect this is exactly what we would find: that the people running twitter have just excluded themselves from their own definition of ‘human.’

OK, that was actually the fun (i.e. snide, mocking) part of this post. Now,


A definition is an un-breakable rule of logic. If something is true ‘by definition,’ then it is true — period. No one can claim differently and still be operating inside the rule of logic and reason.

To claim that a man is a woman simply because he says he is a woman is a contradiction of definitions. Even if he has surgery and injects hormones to alter his body, he is still a man. He still has XY chromosomes. Therefore, by definition, he is a male! Asserting that a man is actually a woman is a contradiction — again, that is also by definition:

contradictionkɒntrəˈdɪkʃən) n

1. the act of going against; opposition; denial

2. a declaration of the opposite or contrary

3. a statement that is at variance with itself (often in the phrase a contradiction in terms)

4. conflict or inconsistency, as between events, qualities, etc

5. a person or thing containing conflicting qualities

6. (Logic) logic a statement that is false under all circumstances; necessary falsehood

In logic, a contradiction is also known as an absurdity. I know it gets old, but — by definition:

absurdity noun

1. The state or quality of being absurd or inconsistent with obvious truth, reason, or sound judgment; want of rationality or common sense: as, the absurdity of superstition; absurdity of conduct.

2. That which is absurd; an absurd action, statement, argument, custom, etc.: as, the absurdities of men; your explanation involves a gross absurdity.

Now, in logic, we have a saying:

“From an absurdity, all things follow.”

That means, once a person convinces you to believe an absurdity, then literally anything and everything becomes true. Now, I want you to pay close attention to this next quote, because the man who said these words was in the same exact wheelhouse we’re in now, and he was driving at the very same point I am trying to make:

“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”


For those who may need help connecting the dots here, the people who tell you a man can become a woman are the very same people who convinced a great many of our neighbors, friends and family to demand lock-downs, experimental jabs, the destruction of our economy, etc…. They can convince you that it is not only a ‘moral’ thing to teach 5 year olds about sex, but that it is perfectly normal for them to have relations with adults. They can tell you that the un-born child is not a person until they are actually 3 years old, and that it is not murder to kill them up to that age (don’t balk, one of the leading ‘medical ethicists’ in the U.S. has made that very argument). In fact, if they can convince you that a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man, then they can convince you that all lives are not equal, and that white lives are actually inferior — and that they hold the moral high ground for saying so. All of the things we’ve seen coming from these people represent lawlessness, chaos and destruction, and they are all atrocities!

But there is an even greater point to be made here. The people who are pushing others to commit these atrocities believe that the ends they seek justify whatever means they need to achieve them. In other words, they do not see any moral problems with whatever atrocities they cause or commit — just as long as they achieve their goals. In fact, many of these people believe that the ‘moral’ thing to do is to kill off some 7.4 billion people. You see, if a man can become a woman, then that’s not murder, its ‘saving the planet.’ And, no, I am not exaggerating. There are people who have argued this point and are currently working toward this goal.

This brings us to another quote by another philosopher who also understood everything we’re discussing here:

“If god does not exist everything is permitted.”

– Dostoevsky

Yes, for those of you with the sharper pencils in the class, I am saying that the people pushing these absurdities on society are Godless. In fact, many of them openly assert that there is no God. Sadly, they do not realize that the claim that there is no God is — itself — an absurdity. But then there are those depraved individuals who push absurdity and promote atrocity who would claim they most certainly do believe in god. Sadly, they are correct. It’s just that the god they worship is themselves (and, yes, that’s right: this is yet another absurdity).

I suppose no one said it better than this man:

Romans 1:28

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a depraved mind, to do those things that are not proper,

(It’s actually a part of Natural Law, folks, which puts it square in the focus of this blog 😉 )



I have a personal aversion to self-promotion. It is the primary reason I have not yet started a video or pod cast. So, if you find this post to be of any value in helping you to better understand our world, or to make sense out of the events of the day, please like it and share it with your friends. Thank you, B3A

2 thoughts on “The ‘Bigger Picture’ Behind The Twitter-Babylon Bee-Rachel Levin Story

  1. This is a big reason why I deleted my twitter accounts (and am ashamed to admit I even had accounts there in the first place). It is a cesspool of censorship and confusion. What really scares me is how popular twitter is with younger generations and how they’re being conditioned to believe absurdities such as this.

  2. Check out Carl Truman’s writings on Expressive Individualism and Aaron Renn’s writings on why we are in a “negative world” with regards to Christianity. Very insightful. Will help explain some of what you said above.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s