When the Political Left in the United States claims that President Trump is destroying America, it is…

You see, for me, it is a given that the political Right in the United States is trying to preserve and defend the founding principles and ideals of America.  But the political Left is doing the same thing.  The problem is, the two sides have entirely different ideas of what those founding principles and ideals actually are because they have two completely different ideas of what America is.

The founding principles and ideals of America are those of equal protection of individual rights and liberty through the fair and impartial rule of law.  Under this ideal, rights and liberty are defined by the individual, himself or herself — not by the government or even by society.  Under this ideal, government exists solely to protect and preserve the individual’s rights and liberty so that they can peruse their own destiny.  This is the point of view from which the American Right sees the world, and that which it seeks to defend: that of a commonwealth of free individuals.

However, the founding ideal of the AmeriKan* Left is  a photo negative of that of the Right.  The Founding ideals of the political Left in this country are found most clearly in the works of Woodrow Wilson.  Wilson did not see nor care about the individual.  For Wilson, everything is defined collectively.  Because Wilson saw Society as a single living organism in which the individual was nothing more than a single cell — and of no more importance — Wilson only recognized liberty in terms of how free the whole society is.  Furthermore, Wilson claimed that the government is the brain of this Social body, and that, because it is the brain, government alone is capable of making the decisions for the whole of society.  Then Wilson went on to argued for a popularly elected head of that government.  In short, Wilson believed in an elected dictatorship where ideas such as rights and liberty were what the central leader said they were.  Thus, the AmeriKan Left sees everything from the perspective of a collective dictatorship.

Therefore, when the American Left claims that they are defending AmeriKa’s values any time someone — anyone — successfully pushes back against their illegal usurpation and centralization of power in this nation, they are correct — from their point of view.

This is also why it is crucial that we always but always assume the Left is speaking from this point of view: so that we never allow ourselves to be fooled into thinking the Left agrees with the Right — because it does not!

BTW: While there may be such a thing as, ‘your truth and my truth,’  unless one or the other is based in and subordinate to objective reality, neither is or can be True.  And by this, I mean both sides can be true in our own fantasy world, but there can never be two equally valid versions of THE Truth because THE Truth exists outside of and totally independent of any and all human beings in this world.  If we all disappeared from the universe, the Truth would still remain…

* If you look, and I mean look hard, you will find that the term, ‘AmeriKa,’ has a distinct meaning.  It was used back in the 1960’s and early 70’s by a radical movement within our university system to represent an agenda which is essentially that of Woodrow Wilson’s: a Communist AmeriKa.  Some 12-15 years ago, you could still find this information on Wikipedia, but it has largely been expunged from the internet.  If you have access to a library with old archives — physical publications — dating back to the early 1980’s or before, you will find that I am correct.  Of this, I have no doubt.

[NOTE: in dealing with America, one must keep in mind that the two different nations I just described started with the division between James Town and Plymouth Rock — where Plymouth Rock represents the soul of our Declaration of Independence and James Town represents the soul of those who see only in material terms.  For those who have eyes to see and ears to here, the Canaanites will always be a thorn in the flesh of Israel, just as Esau will shake off his yoke whenever Jacob fails to perform its function in this world.  The men who wrote our Declaration and Constitution were well aware of what I mean here.  I know of one who even said so, just not in these exact words.  Franklin actually said this land is ‘New Israel,’ but one cannot see this Truth without also seeing the Truths I just stated…]

In the event that you have not been paying attention, the Democrat Party has seized control of the Virginia State govt. and now seeks to ban most all private weapons.  As is the norm where the political Left is concerned, this is not what it appears to be on the surface.  The Democrat Party did not campaign honestly, nor did they win their control over the Virginian government honestly.  There was a lot of deception and meddling by outside interest involved in their ‘victory.’  These articles should be of great interest to anyone truly interested in understanding the magnitude of what the People of Virginia are facing.  People dismiss these stories at their own peril — as well as that of the entire nation:

The Un-Elected Californian Who Engineered Virginia’s Permanent Democrat Majority

Bloomberg Bought Virginia Legislators to Introduce Confiscatory Gun Ban

Virginia Weighs Deploying National Guard to Enforce New Anti-Gun Laws. Things Could Get Ugly.

Now, let’s look at some simple truths that are being grossly distorted in the medias’ handling of this issue:

ALL GUN CONTROL IS LAWLESSNESS

1– The 2nd Amendment is not intended to protect our ability to hunt, go sport shooting,  or even to defend our person.  It was intended to provide for the People’s ability to defend itself from a government exactly like the ones we now have in Democrat Party controlled States such as Virginia — where the government is threatening to use military force to violate the Constitution.

2 — Since the 2nd Amendment is not about personal use, ALL — and I mean ALL — State and Federal gun control laws are unconstitutional.  If we are to have any ordinance limiting the possession of weaponry in this nation, the only way it can possibly be Constitutional is if it is local to the community in question.  You and I can agree to leave our weapons at home when we go into our local township, but no State and certainly not the Federal government can mandate it by law.  And, even then, our local community has absolutely no control over whether or not we own a weapon, or what type of weaponry we own.

3 — The 2nd Amendment protects a Natural — and thus — God-given Right.  Under the founding philosophy of this nation, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence (not the Constitution), this is a right that cannot be willingly surrendered nor justly taken.  Therefore, even if the nation were to repeal the 2nd Amendment through the properly defined Constitutional process, it would still be an unlawful act on par with saying the nation can agree to rescind the general right to life of any and all citizens.

4 — Therefore, any and all attempts to outlaw and/or confiscate the weaponry necessary to insure the People retain the ability to resist a tyrannical government’s army is unlawful!  We cannot even use the Constitutional process of amendments to eliminate the 2nd Amendment as that would constitute a violation of the higher principles which govern over the Constitution, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence.

WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?

What this means is that the people who are working to use our system of government as cover for disarming the People are acting lawlessly.  They are seeking to destroy the very principles upon which our entire society is based, and they are trying to do it from inside of, and using the very systems that were set up to protect and preserve those ideals.  There is a word for this sort of lawlessness:

Definition of subversion

1 : the act of subverting : the state of being subverted especially : a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within

2 obsolete : a cause of overthrow or destruction

[Note: click on the links to ‘subverting’ and ‘subverted.’  Read them.  You will see why I place so much emphasis on knowing and sticking to the definitions or words.  Words are supposed to mean things that are previously and universally understood and, when you know what a word(s) are supposed to mean, you often see things a lot more clearly.  At the very least, it is much more difficult for people to lie to you.]

What this means is that anyone and everyone who actively participates in any attempt to prohibit or confiscate the People’s means to defend themselves from a tyrannical government is guilty of subversion!  And subversion is lawlessness!  PERIOD!

The reader is free to argue with me all they wish, but the reader will still be wrong!  This is not because I claim any special insight, knowledge or superior intellect — quite the opposite.  It is because I bow to the higher Truth which governs this universe; including those things such as logic and the plain meaning of words and language.  I do not fancy myself as God, but I know that those who seek to re-write The Creators eternal truths most certainly do.  They are tyrants, and — like Jefferson — I pledge eternal hostility to tyrants.