I have been warning whoever would listen that the Natural Laws that govern this universe cannot be circumvented or willed away, and they absolutely cannot be avoided. You might postpone them — for a while — but, eventually, they will assert themselves. Well, we are about to witness the Truth of what I tried to tell people.
File this one away under: “That Could Never Happen Here” (also known as, “I Told You So!”)
When you put this latest, unlimited QE story with another story that happened, but you can’t seem to find anywhere on the Internet — you know, the story about the Federal Reserve eliminating the banking requirement to have a 10% reserve — then what you have is total freedom to print money at all levels of government and the private banking industry. Now, what could possibly happen from all this? Just THIS:
BTW: this pattern repeats itself every single time people do what we are currently doing with our monetary policy — EVERY…SINGLE…TIME!
OH! There’s one more thing. While it is true, we are currently witnessing the largest act of theft in all of human history; and while no one is paying attention because they are all distracted by the panic over COVID-19; the part that is truly frightening is the fact that this is exactly how you topple a nation and re-set a financial system. If you can collapse a nation’s money and drive it into bankruptcy, whatever nation comes out the other side — while it may still occupy the same geographical area — it is not the same nation it was before the collapse. They always re-write the government and re-set the monetary system. And no one seems to be worrying about any of this…
Oh, well, I now return you to your previously scheduled panic! Please make sure to watch where ‘They’ tell you to watch, and panic over what ‘They’ tell you to panic.
When the Political Left in the United States claims that President Trump is destroying America, it is…
You see, for me, it is a given that the political Right in the United States is trying to preserve and defend the founding principles and ideals of America. But the political Left is doing the same thing. The problem is, the two sides have entirely different ideas of what those founding principles and ideals actually are because they have two completely different ideas of what America is.
The founding principles and ideals of America are those of equal protection of individual rights and liberty through the fair and impartial rule of law. Under this ideal, rights and liberty are defined by the individual, himself or herself — not by the government or even by society. Under this ideal, government exists solely to protect and preserve the individual’s rights and liberty so that they can peruse their own destiny. This is the point of view from which the American Right sees the world, and that which it seeks to defend: that of a commonwealth of free individuals.
However, the founding ideal of the AmeriKan* Left is a photo negative of that of the Right. The Founding ideals of the political Left in this country are found most clearly in the works of Woodrow Wilson. Wilson did not see nor care about the individual. For Wilson, everything is defined collectively. Because Wilson saw Society as a single living organism in which the individual was nothing more than a single cell — and of no more importance — Wilson only recognized liberty in terms of how free the whole society is. Furthermore, Wilson claimed that the government is the brain of this Social body, and that, because it is the brain, government alone is capable of making the decisions for the whole of society. Then Wilson went on to argued for a popularly elected head of that government. In short, Wilson believed in an elected dictatorship where ideas such as rights and liberty were what the central leader said they were. Thus, the AmeriKan Left sees everything from the perspective of a collective dictatorship.
Therefore, when the American Left claims that they are defending AmeriKa’s values any time someone — anyone — successfully pushes back against their illegal usurpation and centralization of power in this nation, they are correct — from their point of view.
This is also why it is crucial that we always but always assume the Left is speaking from this point of view: so that we never allow ourselves to be fooled into thinking the Left agrees with the Right — because it does not!
BTW: While there may be such a thing as, ‘your truth and my truth,’ unless one or the other is based in and subordinate to objective reality, neither is or can be True. And by this, I mean both sides can be true in our own fantasy world, but there can never be two equally valid versions of THE Truth because THE Truth exists outside of and totally independent of any and all human beings in this world. If we all disappeared from the universe, the Truth would still remain…
* If you look, and I mean look hard, you will find that the term, ‘AmeriKa,’ has a distinct meaning. It was used back in the 1960’s and early 70’s by a radical movement within our university system to represent an agenda which is essentially that of Woodrow Wilson’s: a Communist AmeriKa. Some 12-15 years ago, you could still find this information on Wikipedia, but it has largely been expunged from the internet. If you have access to a library with old archives — physical publications — dating back to the early 1980’s or before, you will find that I am correct. Of this, I have no doubt.
[NOTE: in dealing with America, one must keep in mind that the two different nations I just described started with the division between James Town and Plymouth Rock — where Plymouth Rock represents the soul of our Declaration of Independence and James Town represents the soul of those who see only in material terms. For those who have eyes to see and ears to here, the Canaanites will always be a thorn in the flesh of Israel, just as Esau will shake off his yoke whenever Jacob fails to perform its function in this world. The men who wrote our Declaration and Constitution were well aware of what I mean here. I know of one who even said so, just not in these exact words. Franklin actually said this land is ‘New Israel,’ but one cannot see this Truth without also seeing the Truths I just stated…]
In the event that you have not been paying attention, the Democrat Party has seized control of the Virginia State govt. and now seeks to ban most all private weapons. As is the norm where the political Left is concerned, this is not what it appears to be on the surface. The Democrat Party did not campaign honestly, nor did they win their control over the Virginian government honestly. There was a lot of deception and meddling by outside interest involved in their ‘victory.’ These articles should be of great interest to anyone truly interested in understanding the magnitude of what the People of Virginia are facing. People dismiss these stories at their own peril — as well as that of the entire nation:
Now, let’s look at some simple truths that are being grossly distorted in the medias’ handling of this issue:
ALL GUN CONTROL IS LAWLESSNESS
1– The 2nd Amendment is not intended to protect our ability to hunt, go sport shooting, or even to defend our person. It was intended to provide for the People’s ability to defend itself from a government exactly like the ones we now have in Democrat Party controlled States such as Virginia — where the government is threatening to use military force to violate the Constitution.
2 — Since the 2nd Amendment is not about personal use, ALL — and I mean ALL — State and Federal gun control laws are unconstitutional. If we are to have any ordinance limiting the possession of weaponry in this nation, the only way it can possibly be Constitutional is if it is local to the community in question. You and I can agree to leave our weapons at home when we go into our local township, but no State and certainly not the Federal government can mandate it by law. And, even then, our local community has absolutely no control over whether or not we own a weapon, or what type of weaponry we own.
3 — The 2nd Amendment protects a Natural — and thus — God-given Right. Under the founding philosophy of this nation, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence (not the Constitution), this is a right that cannot be willingly surrendered nor justly taken. Therefore, even if the nation were to repeal the 2nd Amendment through the properly defined Constitutional process, it would still be an unlawful act on par with saying the nation can agree to rescind the general right to life of any and all citizens.
4 — Therefore, any and all attempts to outlaw and/or confiscate the weaponry necessary to insure the People retain the ability to resist a tyrannical government’s army is unlawful! We cannot even use the Constitutional process of amendments to eliminate the 2nd Amendment as that would constitute a violation of the higher principles which govern over the Constitution, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence.
WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?
What this means is that the people who are working to use our system of government as cover for disarming the People are acting lawlessly. They are seeking to destroy the very principles upon which our entire society is based, and they are trying to do it from inside of, and using the very systems that were set up to protect and preserve those ideals. There is a word for this sort of lawlessness:
1: the act of subverting: the state of being subvertedespecially: a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within
2obsolete : a cause of overthrow or destruction
[Note: click on the links to ‘subverting’ and ‘subverted.’ Read them. You will see why I place so much emphasis on knowing and sticking to the definitions or words. Words are supposed to mean things that are previously and universally understood and, when you know what a word(s) are supposed to mean, you often see things a lot more clearly. At the very least, it is much more difficult for people to lie to you.]
What this means is that anyone and everyone who actively participates in any attempt to prohibit or confiscate the People’s means to defend themselves from a tyrannical government is guilty of subversion! And subversion is lawlessness! PERIOD!
The reader is free to argue with me all they wish, but the reader will still be wrong! This is not because I claim any special insight, knowledge or superior intellect — quite the opposite. It is because I bow to the higher Truth which governs this universe; including those things such as logic and the plain meaning of words and language. I do not fancy myself as God, but I know that those who seek to re-write The Creators eternal truths most certainly do. They are tyrants, and — like Jefferson — I pledge eternal hostility to tyrants.
I find that, while I understand how the people on the political Left in America think, I cannot find any common ground between us. Perhaps this means I am broken, myself. Honestly, I do not know. People I admire and have always considered to be far wiser than I will ever be always speak about the common ground between us, so I assume it must be there. I look for it — hard! But, for the life of me, I cannot understand how there can possibly be common ground between a rational, thinking mind and an irrational, emotional creature. Yes, as harsh as it may sound, I do not see the two as equivalent: one is closer to ‘human’ than the other.
If one stops and listens to the people on the political Left, they sound reasonable — on the surface. But that is part of the problem: it is not real. It is an act, a deception — camouflage, if you will. The moment you start to dig deeper, to question them or force them to defend their assertions, you realize there is nothing resembling logic or sound reasoning beneath that mask. They are simply a ball of wants and desires moved along by emotional reactions to whatever stimuli may be affecting them at any given moment. Well, may the Lord forgive me for saying this but, if a creature lives by impulse and instinct alone, then they may be a lot of things, but how ‘human’ are they — exactly? Because, in every definition I have ever heard a Leftist give for ‘human,’ is always but always includes some connection to ‘reason,’ and reason is the key element that seems to be missing from the Leftist mind.
Now, I do not mean to suggest that the Leftist cannot think or strategize. Obviously they can — but then, so can many animals. Higher primates have shown they can even make and use tools, as well as master the basic elements of language and communication — but are they rational? Do they understand the principles of logic? Can they derive them from Natural Law? Can they even recognize Natural Law? I dare say that the answer to these questions is no: such things are beyond the grasp of animals. At the same time, however, they seem to be beyond the grasp os the political Left, as well.
A great example would be the Left’s claim to ‘science.’ The Left is quite fond of attacking those who hold to a belief in the Creator, claiming that we are the ones who have renounced reason. As evidence that they are the more rational, they usually invoke the name of ‘science.’ I find this very fascinating as,it is impossible for a Leftist to understand the foundations of science — real science. Real science is based in fact and logic: principles that are out side of the control of any human, and which do not answer to human will. But the most cursory time debating a Leftist reveals that fact and logic do not register in the Leftist mind. To the Leftist, fact is whatever they deem it to be at the moment and is subject to change to suit their needs/desires in the next. Well, ‘science’ cannot exist in such a world as that, therefore, ‘science’ cannot exist in a Leftist mind. Yet, some how, most Leftists are absolutely convinced that their world is based in ‘reason’ and ‘scientific fact.’
I apologize if I sound harsh or without compassion. I do not mean to do so, but I cannot deny what is demonstrably true: the Leftist simply does not live in or register the objective reality around them. Rather, they live in a world of their own making and demand that everyone else join them in their delusions. Which brings us to another, more dangerous characteristic of the Leftist mind: the tendency to think that, if you do not agree with them, you are a threat that must be eliminated. While they will preach love and tolerance, they demonstrate — by their own actions — that they have no grasp of the concepts behind those words. Or, to put it another way, they use a lot of words whose meanings they do not understand (or mean).
I honestly cannot figure what to make of all this. I know where reason, supported by the factual evidence of actual observation point, but I am extremely uncomfortable accepting that conclusion — mostly because I have a very different definition of ‘human’ than do Leftists. But I know this: the Leftist is a very dangerous creature. They are a danger to themselves; to those around them; to society; and to humanity as a whole. In fact, should Man ever destroy himself, I have no doubt it will be due to some action driven by a Leftist. But there is one useful thing that can be taken from these observations:
They explain the hypocrisy of the Left and its blindness to its own double-standards.
A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city.
But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague.
— Marcus Tullius Cicero, from a speech given to the Roman Senate, recorded in approximately 42 B.C. by Sallust.
Most recently, the American Left invoked Cicero’s warning by applying them to President Trump in relation to their charge that President Trump colluded with Russia. Before that, it was the American Right that invoked Cicero to attack President Obama. So, how does one decide which — if either — is correct? Well, I say we decide by realizing that the real source of treason within our nation is found in the fact that we cannot make this simple determination: by which, I mean it is ‘We, The People,’ who have turned traitor to our nation! How else to explain our confusion over a question that is so factually obvious?
Yes, I mean it is factually obvious as to which Political Party has turned traitor to this nation. Did the Left complain when Obama was recorded telling a Putin advisor to tell Putin that he would be free to act against America’s self-interest in terms of arms control negotiations after his second election?
No! The American Left not only did not see a problem here, they defended Obama’s remarks. But the context here is that Obama was sending Putin a message that he — Obama — would be in a better position to give Putin what he wanted after the election. If this were not the implication, then why worry about the election? Wouldn’t a strong show of defending the U.S. and its interests against Russian demands actually have helped Obama with more Conservative voters? The political answer to that question is, YES! So why did Obama say he had to wait until after the election to make a deal with Putin? Well, a long history with the Democrat Party would suggest that Obama intended to act contrary to America’s best interest, but he knew he could not do so before the election or he might lose that election. Therefore, this video indicates evidence of treasonous intent, but the American Left never once admitted this was even a possibility.
At the same time, we have the American Left accusing Trump of treason based on this video:
However, there never was any solid proof of Trump-Russia collusion in the U.S. election and the Press knew it. In fact, the Press, the American Left and Obama, himself, were all saying there was no possibility of Russian interference in American elections just two years earlier. This is just one video clip that proves this is fact:
And now we know that the claim of Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election was actually created by people within and working for the Obama Administration so that they could perpetrate a fraud upon the FISA Court in order to spy on their political opponent, then candidate Trump. This lead the the Mueller investigation which amounted to another Left-Wing fraud upon our nation that also gave political aid and comfort to our nation’s enemies. The fraudulent Mueller investigation then morphed into a fraudulent impeachment investigation, aiding our nation’s enemies yet again in the process by weakening the President and his ability to protect the nation abroad. Taken together, the claims of Trump–Russia collusion, the Mueller investigation and the impeachment amount to an on-going coup attempt; a conclusion further strengthened by the fact that the people leading it said they would remove President Trump before he was even sworn in to office. All of this is factual, and it all points to one political Party — the Democrats.
Now we have the President eliminating an Iranian threat to America and her people and the American Left immediately condemns the President and defends the Iranian terrorist. Had we actually declared war against terror, this would amount to a clear and undeniable act of treason. However, I cannot help but ask a simple question: does such an act cease to be treason simply because the Congress refuses to perform its duties of defending this nation and declare war on terrorists? Our military is still in combat defending us from people who have openly stated that they consider themselves to be at war against us. So, how is defending those self-declared enemies of America not considered treason?
Well, I think I found the answer to this question, and it is why I fear for our survival. The answer is simple:
The true trader inside our nation is ‘We, The People!’
If we were not traitors, then we would have no difficulty seeing that, while their are individual traitors on the Right (if they are even Right-wing at all), the American Left is a clear and present danger to our country, and that it has openly declared war upon the nation that allows it to exist. This is treason — pure and simple. But allowing that Party and the people within it to continue to wage their war against the nation… Well, that is treason on an entirely different level.
No nation can survive when its own people turn against it, and yet, too many Amerikans have turned against America. The only question now is: will we survive this treason inside our gates? Well, if Cicero is to be our guide, the answer would appear to be, NO!
BTW: The list of treason committed by the American Left is quite lengthy. It includes the push to disarm America. It includes the corruption of our courts, turning them into de facto star-chambers that rule from on high. It includes the abdication of Congressional authority, ceding it to an Unconstitutional bureaucracy. It includes every welfare and redistribution program the Left has ever pushed. It includes the indoctrination pushed through our schools. It includes the claims that this is not an exceptional nation (especially when they refuse to explain what is actually meant by that claim). All of this and more constitute acts of treason against the founding principles and ideals of this nation. Rather than do the work necessary to convince the nation to agree with them, and to go through the legal processes laid out in the Constitution needed to change the Constitution to their ideas, the Left has chosen subversion and sedition and — now — open treason — and we have allowed and supported them the whole way…