Category Archives: CONSPIRACY THEORY

Occam’s Razor, the Globalist Agenda and Left-Wing Destruction of America

I assume that — by now — most all Americans have heard of Occam’s Razor. If not, in a nutshell, it is a logical principle which states:

“All things being equal, the simplest solution is usually the correct one.”

The classic example of how Occam’s Razor works is:

“If you are hearing hoof-beats, think horse, not zebra.”

It has become common to see people using Occam’s Razor to dismiss opposition they do not like, or which damages their agenda. This is especially true when it is cited in conjunction with opposition to supposed ‘Conspiracy Theory.’ However, most of the people citing it do not apply Occam’s Razor correctly; they leave out one critical precept of the maxim. If you’ll give me a few minutes, I will do my best to explain.

The problem is found in the first and most crucial point of the maxim:

“All things being equal…”

So, assuming our example of hearing hoof-beats:

IF we are in the U.S., then the example I stated above is an accurate application of Occam’s Razor — unless I happen to be in a U.S. zoo, or game preserve that keeps zebras.

You see, very, very few people bother to establish that the things being compared are equal before appealing to Occam’s Razor. When this happens, they are not making a rational argument. In fact, they are committing a fallacy, a mistake in logic. By definition, this is an irrational act.

Occam’s Razor stipulates ‘all things must be equal.’ So, what does, ‘all things being equal,’ mean? Well, in common language, it means you have to prove you are comparing apples to apples. Here, let me give you another example you might have seen used in the news. It takes many forms, but they usually go something like this:

“Occam’s Razor dictates that the simpler answer to — insert ‘Conspiracy Theory’ here — is stupidity, not conspiracy.”

[NOTE: this is actually amodified appeal to a sub-set of Occam’s Razor known as Hanlon’s Razor.]

OK, now, let’s take the most obvious target of such a refutation of ‘Conspiracy Theory:’ the New World Order. The claim is that we should never assign evil intent to anything that can be explained by simple stupidity, such as the New World Order ‘Conspiracy Theorists.’ But there’s a problem with using Occam’s Razor to dismiss claims about the NWO. In fact, there are two problems.

First, you must make sure every aspect of the two things being considered are actually equal. In this case, those two things that are claimed are ‘conspiracy’ and ‘stupidity.’ But this is not what is actually being compared. You see, the claim that there is a group of people working to force a NWO on the world is not a theory. It is fact. The people pushing the NWO have not made themselves secret: they have been very open about their goal and their plans to achieve it. They just boasted about it this past week:

Therefore, ‘all things’ are not equal, and the people who purport to use Occam’s Razor to ‘debunk’ assertions about the NWO are not only committing the fallacy of equivocation (comparing apples to oranges), they are also appealing to ignorance (counting on the fact that their audience will not understand the trick they are playing on them).

But there is another fallacy contained in this modified use of Occam;s Razor. There is no truth in the claim that we should choose stupidity over malice/conspiracy. In fact, I would argue the exact opposite is true. Therefore, to use Hanlon’s Razor in citing Occam’s Razor against NWO assertions, as many as three fallacies are being committed.

If you understand logic, this is enough to make you laugh at the person committing these fallacies as they have just demonstrated they are either stupid, or exhibiting malice — which means they have actually refuted themselves, not the claims about the NWO! 🙂

APPLYING THIS TO ANOTHER CURRENT EVENT:

There are consistent claims that the American Left is actively working to destroy this country. Many in the media — on both sides — will claim Occam’s Razor to ‘debunk’ these assertions. But is this actually an accurate use of Occam’s Razor? Let’s look at the first precept: is everything equal? Start by asking yourself these questions:

First, has anyone on the Left ever said they want to destroy, remake or fundamentally transform the country?

Next, can a ‘stupid’ person win office without — at the very least — being helped by a ‘smart’ person?

If a ‘stupid’ person needs and receives help from a ‘smart’ person, then who is likely to be in control of the ‘stupid’ person after they win their election?

Then, do all of the programs the Left shuts down have a net positive or negative effect on the health of the nation and its economy?

And, do all the programs the Left forces have a net positive or negative effect on the health of the nation and its economy?

Finally, is there any indication that the refused and forced policies work together or align with a single agenda? Put another way: do they show actual forethought and coordination?

Now, do the math: is there more evidence of simple stupidity, or intentional planning? If you find more evidence of simple stupidity, then why do people vote for those stupid people unless they are just as stupid (or worse, more stupid)? However, if you find the preponderance of the evidence indicates some level of planning and coordination, then Occam’s Razor actually dictates malice/conspiracy — not stupidity! And those who use Occam’s Razor to dismiss anyone trying to point out the evidence are committing logical fallacies. And, if they are intentionally arguing a fallacy, the next thing you have to do is decide:

Is that person stupid, or are they a part of the malice/conspiracy?

See why I love logic? When applied properly, it usually exonerates the innocent and bites bites stupidity/malice/conspiracy in the rear-end! LOL 🙂

Well, Now, Isn’t This Cute?

Have you ever noticed that it is always the privileged who tell us we are the spoiled ones and, therefore, we are the ones who need to ‘sacrifice’ in order to save the world?

BlackRock president warns ‘entitled generation that has never had to sacrifice’ that they will soon face shock due to major shortages: ‘Put on your seatbelts’

The president of the world’s largest asset management company just issued a stark warning to members of America’s “entitled generation.”

Tell me something: how much ‘sacrifice’ do you think this guy is going to make?

If I were to say what I actually think we should do in response to this, this man — and his friends — would likely label me a ‘terrorist’ and have me jailed. But that isn’t what actually bothers me most. What bothers me most is, if I were to echo TJ here, rather than rallying to the call, the vast majority of Americans would sit back and just take the pain this man plans to inflict on them.

Oh, and one more thing!

Never forget that the whole reason for this need to ‘sacrifice’ is artificial. This man and his friends have created an artificial crisis specifically for the reason of getting you to willingly submit to the ‘sacrifices’ they are going to demand from you — and it is all so they can set up a new global feudalism where They rule the world!

Now, choose: will you bow to them, or to the Creator of the Universe. Just remember: one will maybe save your life here, now — for a little while. But the other, though you may lose your life here, will give you eternal life with Him in the hereafter. So, again, choose well. Oh! And, if you choose not to choose, or worse, you choose wrong, don’t try to say you weren’t warned.

Who Is The ‘Reasonable,’ Moral Person Among Us These Days?

We live in a day and age where few people bother to actually read. I pray this is not my audience. However, for the sake of those who might wish to share my posts with those who refuse to concentrate for more than a few seconds, here is a powerful message presented as succinctly as I know how to share it.

FIRST, A MEME:

NEXT, A 21 SECOND VIDEO:

FINALLY, A QUESTION:

Who is the most ‘reasonable,’ moral person among us: the one who believes and places their trust in these people, are the one who rejects them as what they are: liars, thieves, pedophiles, murderers and psychopaths?

********************

THE POINT EXPLAINED: The People condemned in the meme are the same as the guy in the video. They have to convince you to accept their ideas by lying to and deceiving you, and they have been repeatedly caught in their lies. They are all Socialists of some flavor or another, and all Socialism is theft, which means they are all thieves. A great many of them have been exposed to be pedophiles, which is why nothing ever happened with Epstein’s files, or the accusations toward Hollywood and — now — Disney and teachers admitting to their perversions. They created and used COVID-19 to shut down the world, murdering thousands in the process (yes, all of that is absolutely true, and the proof is in the public square, but their media will not share it with you). This puts them in the same category as Hitler, Stalin and Mao. Now, in this video, one of their public leaders boasts about what ‘They’ are going to do to the whole world. He even admits that they have no idea how ‘Their’ experiments will affect the world, but he knows it will likely cause world-wide upheaval (which will result in many, many more deaths). But does he show any humility or question whether or not ‘They’ should do any of these things? NO! He is actually excited about it, and that makes him part of a cabal of psychopaths.

BEHOLD! The New World Order (a.k.a. The Beast)!

So, you think this is all ‘conspiracy theory?’ Then, please, go home and rest comfortably in your chains and like the hand of your new masters while the rest of us try to forget you were ever one of our fellow countrymen. TO THE REST OF YOU: You need to be aware that the NWO is at hand, and they are forcing their utopian vision on you without your consent — while proclaiming ‘democracy’ the whole way. Here the forked-tung serpents speak in their own words:

Klaus Schwab Tells Global Leaders to Collaborate for World Governance

Biden is planning a new digital currency. Here’s why you should be very worried

Fed ‘actively working’ on US digital currency, official says

NY Times Op-Ed Endorses Fed-Backed Cryptocurrency With ‘Incentive’ for People to Spend by ‘Shrinking’ Balances if They Refuse

A Cornell University professor took to the pages of The New York Times on Thursday to call for a government-backed digital currency capable of imposing an “incentive” to make Americans spend faster.

Did you catch that? They will use this new digital currency to ‘impose’ (i.e. force) you to spend faster through ‘incentives’ (i.e. penalties). They have already explained that, if you do not do what they want, the most likely ‘incentive’ will be that they just take some of the money you are trying to save away from you: just ‘poof’ — GONE! ‘They’ call this a ‘nudge.’ This is the whole idea of ‘Nudge,’ which I tried to explain in several of my posts:

*******************

EXCERPT FROM A PREVIOUS POST:

*** I have repeatedly warned my oldest friend, those who read my blogs and others that the Left has plans to establish itself as a dictatorship, and to literally control every aspect of human life. I have tried to explain what they plan to do and why. The problem is, they do not do these things in one big event. That would shock you, and they realize it. Rather, they affect their plans incrementally, and largely through subtle coercion. One of the clearest and most easily accessible explanations of what they do and how they do it can be found in this book (which I reference toward the end of this blog post):

Once you understand the information in this book, and what the Left wants to do, you can step back and look at history. Then you will see a great many of the things I have warned about either are being or have already been accomplished. So, even here, my oldest friend is wrong when he tells himself none of my warnings have come to pass. They have, he just doesn’t see it because, though he has eyes and ears, he cannot see or hear. And though he is ever learning, he never understands.

*******************

In case you do not understand what you are watching happen in this world, I’ll explain:

Revelation 13:16-18 New American Standard Bible

1And he causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 and he decrees that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.

[NOTE: Believe as you will, but consider this before you decide. First, Scripture defines a beast as a kingdom/government. Next, ‘6’ is the number of Man, and ‘6-6-6’ can b viewed as Man, three times. More than this, there is an ancient Hebrew idiom that uses “In your head and in your hand” as a way of saying “What you think and what you do.” So, while there could be a physical mark, we must remember, a physical mark has nothing to do with your salvation. Scripture says that is all about your heart/faith. It is about who you trust, and — in this case — the choice is YHWH, or Man/government.]

*******************

HERE IS THE ENTIRE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT SUMMIT VIDEO:

‘They’ always boast about their plans. Remember, ‘They’ also televised their plans for COVID-19 in a summit called, ‘Event 201.’

Hypocrisy Through Willful Ignorance

I was just thinking about how many times I have been dismissed by ignorant people who called me a ‘conspiracy theorist.’ Many of them will then turn around and decry the evil of Socialism, and rightfully so. But there is a common thread here. They embrace the truth that Socialism is evil because — even if it is just listening to talking heads repeating other peoples’ research — they have actually done some semblance of research into the issue. However, when you bring them evidence that some or much of what they think they know is based in lies, or you try to show them how they have been fooled and why, they will reject you. Why? Because they are ignorant. Now stupid, ignorant: they do not know what I know. Well, I do not fault them for their ignorance, but I certainly hold them in contempt for their stubborn refusal to research for themselves before they make a judgment on me or the information I have tried to share with them.

Proverbs 18:13

One who gives an answer before he hears,

It is foolishness and shame to him.

[I strongly suggest reading the entire Proverb]

I am aware that many who read my work are politically orientated, and of a ‘Conservative’ bent. I am also aware that many of those people have trouble with my ‘conspiracy theories.’ So, let me try to make my point this way:

One of the problems with those who support the lies of ‘Socialism’ is that they believe it is moral to take from one and give to another — where the ‘other’ is usually themselves. At it’s heart, the problem with Socialism is that it embraces a violation of Natural Law. First, you cannot reap a reward where you have not sewn effort, but this is exactly what the average supporter of Socialism seeks: gain without cost; reward without risk; money without work. It violates the universal constant commonly expressed as:

“There is no such thing as a free lunch.”

Most of those who read my work understand this, and usually, they understand it because they have done something to teach themselves that it is true. They have either studied it, seen it in practice, or researched it in history. However they have done it, they have gathered enough truth to draw the only rational conclusion. So, why do so many of these same people refuse to put in the effort necessary to prove or disprove to themselves the truth of what I try to share and explain? Well, sadly, the answer is simple: they are much like the Socialist who wants reward without effort. Only, in this case:

They want the comfort that comes with the certainty of their beliefs without the cost of having to test their beliefs.

As I see it, we are all guilty of doing this in some way, so, to some degree, we are all hypocrites. Most don’t seem to care about that, but I try — hard — to fight against it. It has made me much more humble as I have come to learn I actually don’t know or understand as much as I once thought I did. It has also made me much more gracious toward others. If I don’t have the time or desire to research something, why should I expect others to do so? But then, I am learning to keep my mouth shut when and where I realize I am ignorant. If only the majority of other hypocrites could or would do the same…