So we need to get rid of the Confederate Battle Flag because of what others claim it represents.  It is ‘politically correct’ to hate the people who embrace the flag because they are ‘haters.’  In fact, it is ‘politically correct’ to remove any and all traces of the very culture that created that flag.  Well, if you believe this lie, make sure you remember you support the idea when Islam starts to do it in mass here in America — because it will.  It has already started.  But then, this is what all enemies of individual liberty always do: they always seek to change the past so they can control the present:

AGENDAS: Recognizing Totalitarianism in Modern American Society

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

This is why Islam always builds its mosques on top of the holy sites of the nations it conquerors.  It is why Muslims are destroying the monuments and museum pieces of those nations.  They have been commanded by Muhammad to destroy any and all traces of the former culture.  Anyone who thinks this will be different here in America is a fool. After all, this nation has twice elected a President whose wife openly boasted that he was going to do the same thing to us:

So why should we expect that Muslims will not be successful in doing the same thing?  Especially since they are not only being protected by our government, but their religion is actually being embraced by and pushed by government entities all over this nation:

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam And The American Left

This is correct: the American Progressive Left has been allied with Islam for some time now.  Both seek to control every individual in this nation.  Both try to do this by destroying the past.  Both think they can use the other to achieve their goal — at which time, both will seek to kill off the other.  Why?  Because both reject the One True God and His Natural Laws.

In my last post, I explained that what is really at stake i the upcoming Supreme Court ruling on ‘gay’ marriage is whether or not we are going to give the government authority to define words.  Do not ignore the importance of my claim.  Progressive control our society, and Progressives honestly believe they can control humanity by controlling the language.  I have written about this on my other blog, The OYL  (TRUTH: Those Who Embrace Political Correctness Are Furthest From Sanity).  If the Supreme Court allows the government to “change our history and our traditions” by changing the meaning of words, then there will be no end to the tyranny that will result.  Once it happens, it will be only a matter of time before you find yourself on the receiving end of this compulsion to control and to destroy all those who oppose that control.  We are already seeing it now in the EPA. Continue reading First ‘Gay’ Marriage, Next — ANYONE Who Objects! →

If you find this post valuable to you in any way, Please share it on Face Book.

The Supreme Court is set to decide whether or not there is a Constitutionally protected right to ‘gay’ marriage, but this is not what is actually being decided.  What is really being decided is whether or not rights can contradict.  The goal is to establish that rights can contradict because it opens the door for government to decide which rights take precedence over others.  I have already explained why rights cannot contradict and why.  This then begs the question as to why the Courts would even consider this case about ‘gay’ marriage.  The answer is simple: this is not about rights.  That claim is just propaganda aimed at creating an emotional appeal so you will not use reason to examine what is really happening.  However, if you can set the emotion aside and look at what is actually happening, you will quickly see that this is about giving the government a path to destroy the First Amendment!

The process is simple: if there is a ‘right’ to ‘gay’ marriage, then it suddenly becomes a ‘hate’ crime to oppose ‘gay’ marriage in any form.  This opens the door to the destruction of faith-based organizations.  It will not matter whether they are churches or businesses, they will have to comply with the government dictates or be shut down.  But it goes further than that.  If you are a doctor but disagree with homosexuality, you could lose your job.  Same for lawyers, firemen, police officers: anyone who disagrees with homosexuality will be at risk of government persecution.

You see, what the Supreme Court is actually about to rule on is whether or not the government has the authority to define bigotry and then use that as a justification to persecute anyone who has just been declared a bigot.  This is one of the reasons I write so much about language, both here, but especially on my other blog, The OYL.  If the government is allowed to redefine the meaning of words at will, then it does not matter what the law says: it will change according to the whims of the government.  This is the very definition of tyranny.  Yet, this is what the Supreme Court is about to decide: whether or not the government has dictatorial powers.

If you doubt me, consider this: what happens is someone you disagree with politically gets into power?  And once in power, that person reverses the definitions of words?  And hatred is suddenly defined as anyone who opposes Islam?  It may not bother you that Jews and Christians will still be persecuted, but now, so will homosexuals.  Yes, the court and law will still say you cannot ‘discriminate’ because of homosexuality, but the government will have just put the rights of Muslims over those of homosexuals.  So now, where the law will allow homosexuals to claim their rights over those of Christians, it will also support the rights of Muslims to exercise their rights over both homosexuals and Christians.  Now, just in case you do not understand what this means, I’ll explain: it means Christians will have to either convert to Islam, pay a punitive tax or die.  However, homosexuals only have one option — to die!

There are other scenarios that I could use to illustrate how this will work, but the point is this: it is not about ‘gay’ marriage, it is about opening a path to destroy the First Amendment.  It is about destroying the right to conscience, and by extension, freedom of expression. It is about the Supreme Court finally handing the government dictatorial powers as a matter of law.  But understand, if the Court does this, it will actually be destroying the law.  So this ruling is not about ‘gay’ rights: it is about the final destruction of the U.S. Constitution — period!