Daily Archives: June 24, 2022

APPLIED LOGIC

APPLIED LOGIC: Liz Cheney Proves My Point About The GOP

I once read a book that told me there is only 1 Party pretending to be 2. You should read it some time. It was written by a Leftist insider, and it predicted/explained almost every ‘conspiracy theory’ that has come to fruition these past few years:

Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time

Well, no one ever wants to listen to me, or Quigley, for that matter. I wonder, now that the Cheney campaign is actively courting Democrats to help keep her in power, do you think we might finally accept that the GOP are not ‘RINOS,’ but DIGOPSs??? (Democrats in GOP skins)

Cheney campaign dispatches mailers that discuss how to switch party affiliation in order to back Cheney during the Republican congressional primary

Wyoming Democratic Party chair Joseph Barbuto got a mailer from the incumbent Republican lawmaker’s campaign, according to the New York Times — the outlet reported that Barbuto said that his social media feeds during the last week had been filled with Democrats noting that they had gotten Cheney campaign mailers. “I haven’t had any Republicans share online or tell me that they received it,” Barbuto noted on Thursday, according to the Times.

Now, if it were just Cheney, you could make an argument that this is an isolated incident of a desperate politician — but it isn’t ‘just Cheney.’ There have been plenty of similar shenanigans surrounding multiple Republican politicians, and all of them inevitably work to further the Leftist agenda. But then, so do many Republicans who pretend to be ‘Conservative’ — until it comes time to actually push the Conservative agenda. Then, suddenly, as if by some Roberts’ mid-night crayola crayon amendment to a legal ruling, these good ‘Conservatives’ become ‘RINOs!’ HA! Tricks on you, folks! They were Leftists all along and they played you!

The sad part is, you keep letting them play you by accepting the lie that if you do not vote for the Republican Leftist, the Democrat Leftist will destroy the nation.

News Flash: ALL LEFTISTS SEEK TO DESTROY THE NATION!

So what does it matter if you vote for a D or R Leftist? It’s like arguing over whether to drink cyanide or arsenic.

Still, the only thing that matters to me in this is that it proves I WAS CORRECT!!! 🙂

ADDENDUM 6.26.2022

This is yet another example:

Senator in 2010 deposition: 13-year-olds can consent to sex

“…in a 2010 deposition in the case, given a week after he was elected to his first term in the U.S. House, Lankford testified that he believed a 13-year-old could consent to sex.

“Yes, I think they can,” Lankford told Kenyatta Bethea, a lawyer for the girl’s family, according a 155-page transcript of the deposition obtained by The Associated Press.”

Read the story; it gets worse.

How does this prove the GOP is no different than the Democrats:

Just like the Democrats and their sexual predators and child molesters, this guys GOP colleagues knew darn well he thinks this way, yet they said nothing about it. They need the win, even if it means putting pedophiles in office.

APPLIED LOGIC, IN THE HEADLINES

IN THE HEADLINES: Roe vs Wade Ruling ‘Outs’ ANTIFA As Domestic Terrorist Group!

1 Comment

Have you seen this story yet?

Antifa, radical leftists reportedly call for ‘night of rage’ in wake of SCOTUS abortion overturn: ‘Enough is enough with peaceful protest’

Ngo also tweeted that the Washington, D.C., chapter of the Youth Liberation Front — another “violent Antifa group” — is “calling for people to wear black, mask up & to meet at Folger Park at 7:30 p.m. The YLF was responsible for months of extreme violence in Portland & Seattle in 2020.”

OK, now, do me a favor and read this next quote very carefully:

terrorism

1. The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.

2. Resort to terrorizing methods as a means of coercion, or the state of fear and submission produced by the prevalence of such methods.

3. The act of terrorizing, or state of being terrorized; a mode of government by terror or intimidation.

Tell me how ANTIFA does not meet this definition? The truth is, ANTIFA is — by definition — a terrorist group. Since they also meet the definition of ‘domestic,’ this makes them a domestic terrorist group. This cannot be argued by any rational person.

So, why haven’t they been treated the same way the people caught up in the January 6 ordeal were treated???

Trick question!

ANSWER: the American Left (DNC/Media/Corproate America/Etc.) supports ANTIFA! ANTIFA is their ‘black/brown shirts.’ This means that ANTIFA is the guerilla/para-military arm of the American Left. The Left will never even acknowledge ANTIFA’s sedition, but they will falsely accuse and prosecut etheir political enemies under false accusation of the very thing ANTIFA has and is doing.

It’s all based on definitions, folks. Just apply them accurately and the answers fall into place…

Abortion, THE CONSTITUTION

SCOTUS Misses The Mark On Abortion — AGAIN!

BY now, most of you have heard that Roe vs. Wade has been shot down. Good! It deserved to be — because it was bad law. But so is this latest ruling. Once again, the SCOTUS has tried to pass-off on the real issue: defining life.

Look, I have written about this before. You can find the post here:

There Is Not Now, Nor Has There EVER Been A ‘Right’ To Murder An Unborn Child — AND I CAN PROVE IT!

This is a very simple issue — if we would only return to originalist thinking (like the Founders said we are supposed to use when ‘interpreting’ the Constitution).

1st — Ultimately, the Right to life is found in the Declaration of Independence, which is our founding document and carries the weight of law. This is not B3A’s opinion; it is the direct assertion of the Founders! So, it is not open to debate, and the only ones who claim otherwise are those who wish to subvert the foundation of our government.

2nd — Even if we refuse to address the Declaration, then we have the Bill of Rights. When was the last time you read this?

Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The unborn child is a human being with an individual Right to their life. As such, the Federal government has a duty to protect the unborn’s life. It is not the woman’s body. This is by definition. So, in order to justify the taking of that child’s life, the woman has to be able to show a compelling need that would also justify the taking of a life from a random person picked off the street. This is the measuring stick against which the woman has to make her case; not the fallacious claim of ‘my body, my choice.’

One more thing: if you think that the unborn is not a human under our laws, you need to return to the Founders. They counted the unborn as a human life from the point of the quickening. They used this point because it was the first sure sign they had in their day that the woman was pregnant. We cannot know if they would have assigned personhood from the first moment ya pregnancy test shows the woman is pregnant, but we can readily infer that they considered an unborn person to be a human life which, according to the Declaration, imparts a right to that life from the moment of creation (‘created equal, and with the inalienable right to life…’).

There! I just wrote the Constitutional opinion the SCOTU still refuses to write, and it is 100% within the Founders’ frame work of the Declaration and Constitution.