So, You Don’t Believe Video Games are Connected to a Rise in Violence?

I find it very interesting that the media, politicians and video game industry all circle the wagons when video games are linked to violence in our society.  I find it interesting for several reasons.  First, while these folks deny the link, the U.S. Military is openly boasting about how well these violent games work at desensitizing its soldiers.  I mean, if the U.S. Military says these games make it easier for grown, disciplined men to kill without feeling, how is it that a child with much less self-control is somehow inoculated from this influence?  But then, given the corporate link between the military and these gaming companies, how is it the Leftists defending the video games do not see the ‘corruption that is going on here?  Personally, I understand how this all works.  It is part of The Big Lie.

Folks, I am not going to belabor this topic too much.  I’ve done the research, I have my sociology degree and I am convinced there is a causal link here.  If you use your common sense, you should be able to see there is a problem with the narrative.  If the video games help soldiers find it easier to kill, then the video games must also do something similar to the people in the civilian world — especially since many of the civilian games were developed by the military and sold to the video game companies (and vice-verse).  No, I’m just going to leave you with these and let you decide what you want to do with them.  But know this: I will not be very kind to anyone who tries to tell me there is nothing here unless they have read at least five of these stories — especially the professional articles, such as the one by Psychology Today!

Are Video Games Teaching Children to Kill?

“Violent video games teach kids to kill using the same mechanisms of classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social learning employed to train soldiers. The major psychological differentiator between a soldier’s training and a video game player’s training is that soldiers are taught to kill while simultaneously being taught strict discipline. This safeguard operates as a secondary safety catch that prevents soldiers from unlawful or unauthorized killing.”

Violent Video Games Can Trigger Emotional Desensitization

“Repeated play of violent video games desensitizes gamers to feelings of guilt.”

Military veteran says video games fueling violent culture

“Lt. Col. Dave Grossman spent a total of 23 years leading U.S. soldiers and is a former West Point psychology professor who has become a noted scholar and expert on human aggression, violence and killing. Grossman, the author of “Assassination Generation: Video Games, Aggression, and the Psychology of Killing,” believes video games and our media culture can be blamed for the rise in violence in our society.”

Virtual realities: The use of violent video games in U.S. military recruitment and treatment of mental disability caused by war

“This article critically analyzes the U.S. military’s contradictory use of violent video gaming technologies for recruiting young gamers to the military, training soldiers for combat, and clinically treating soldiers for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by military service.”

The Murderous Military Uses Call of Duty for Target Practice

“In 2012, Brock Bastian and several other psychologists ran a study on the effects of violent video games on the brain. Unsurprisingly, they found a deeply chilling result: the games could actually desensitize soldiers and other people to real-world violence.”

THE SCIENCE OF CREATING KILLERS / Human reluctance to take a life can be reversed through training in the method known as killology

“Target practice on hollowed cabbages filled with ketchup to mimic the way a bullet rips open a human head. Marching to chants of “kill, kill, kill.” Video game simulations that reward points for every successful “shot.” These are among hundreds of techniques that experts say can recondition the human brain.”

How video games train the brain to justify killing

“A plethora of studies now associate playing such games with greater tolerance of violence, reduced empathy, aggression and sexual objectification. Compared with males who have not played violent video games, males who do play them are 67 per cent more likely to engage in non-violent deviant behavior, 63 per cent more likely to commit a violent crime or a crime related to violence, and 81 per cent more likely to have engaged in substance use. Other studies have found that engaging in cyberviolence leads people to perceive themselves as less human, and facilitates violence and aggression.”

How the US military is using ‘violent, chaotic, beautiful’ video games to train soldiers

“In recent years, the military has encouraged many of its soldiers to partake in the thrill of violent video games as a way to continue combat training, even when not on active duty.”

Still trust the media and your politicians?

 

The Media & ‘The Big Lie’

“The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies.

— Adolf Hitler

This method works, and it works well.  You may not even realize how often and how well it has been used on you — but it has.  Let me show you:

We all ‘know’ that White Supremacy is connected to Right-Wing politics, right?

WRONG!

This is a lie we have been sold by the Left.  Racism has always been connected to the American Left-Wing, even where Hitler is concerned (the NAZIs got their master race program from American Eugenicists and Fabian Socialists in England — and said so!).

OK, well, we all “know” that the Democrats and Republicans switched positions in the 1960’s, and was the result of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy,’ right?

WRONG!

The switch never happened!  That is another lie sold to us by the Left.

Now, we all “know” that the Right-Wing is behind or the reason for or is causing all these mass shootings and other forms of violence, right?”

WRONG!

Once again, this is a lie sold to us by the Left!

Oh, one more thing.  We all “know” that the ‘Alt-Right’ and the ‘Right-Wing’ are the same thing, right?’

WRONG!

Yep, you guessed it: another lie sold to us by the Left!

So, if all of the things we thought we “knew” are lies, how and why can I say they were sold to us by the Left?  Simple: the American Left controls our news media, social media, schools, colleges, entertainment industry, the Democrat and parts of the Republican Party as well as the Deep State.  This means they control much of the narrative, as well as the ability to squash any and all attempts to teach the Truth.

Admittedly, this is a generalization, but one that will serve you well:

If the Left accuses someone of being something ugly, the chances are, the Left is actually the guilty party.

 

 

The Left Is Telling You They Want To Kill People!!!

For all its claims to be the morally superior position, it is the Left that wants to force people to do what they say and who will kill people if they do not comply.  Do not take my word for this, take theirs!  All of the following stories and video clips are linked to the American political Left:

HuffPo Pulls Article Calling For ‘Ultimate Punishment’ Of Trump

GOP baseball shooter was ‘democratic socialist’ Sanders supporter, vowed to ‘destroy’ Trump

Anti-Gun Agitators Harass Sen. McConnell at His Home: ‘Just Stab the Motherf*cker in the Heart!’

Black Lives Matter Leader at Mitch McConnell’s home Calls for Someone to “Stab the M*****F** in the Heart”

Leftist ‘Intellectual’ Calls For ‘Eradicating’ Trump Supporters

INSANE: Anti-Trump Liberal Says ‘People Have to Die’ During CNN Coverage

Antifa Video Reveals Plans To Trap Conservatives In ‘Kill Zones’ And Shoot Them

New Facebook Policy Normalizes, Approves Death Threats Against Banned “Dangerous” Conservatives

This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing

Ilhan Omar Promotes Tweet Celebrating Violent Attack On Rand Paul

14 Times Republican Officials Were Viciously Harassed, Threatened With Death

A partial list of threats against GOP and Trump from Hollywood celebrities

Why do liberals want to kill conservatives? Here’s a list of liberal threats and attacks on conservatives since mid-2016

Here Are 12 of the Left’s Worst Recent Attacks on Conservatives

Gun Control Advocates Threaten to Kill Conservative Woman for Graduation Photo

Former Carter staffer: ‘Shoot Republicans’ to save animals, environment

46 Population Control Quotes That Show How Badly The Elite Want To Wipe Us All Out

I have not listed all the Left-Wing ‘Occupy” attacks and threats to those on the Right.  Nor have I listed the Left-Wing BLM attacks and threats.  I could easily go on listing these stories, but why bother.  The reader either sees and understands by now, or the reader will never see it until they start doing this:

This video is speaking about a member of the Obama Administration, Bill Ayres, who said he has never repented or changed his mind and wishes he could have done more to bring his goals to fruition.

Finally, there is this video.  The crucial part starts around the 8-9 minute mark, but the whole video is crucial to watch and understand — because this video exposes the modern American Left!

In this video, Al Gore hints at the possibility that the Left will soon be able to abort people who will be inclined to be ‘Conservative’ BEFORE THEY CAN BE BORNE!!!

Social Engineering: Eugenics And The Progressives

BTW: When Hillary said she is a Progressive in the same way as the early 20th Century Progressives, she was saying she is one of those who wants to kill her opposition!!!

 

 

Red Flag Laws & ‘The Slippery Slope’

I am a combat vet, and I have no wish to see civil war on U.S. soil.  So you can know that I am being deadly serious when I write this post.

Folks, you should reject ‘Red Flag’ laws.  If necessary, this is an issue over which we should take up arms.  If they get these laws in place, it will be the end of the U.S. and the end of liberty anywhere in this world save for Israel!  For some of you, that should bring a whole story-line to mind — and that story does not end well for the majority of this world.

I am not going to spend a lot of time on this post.  I don’t have to do so to make my point.  All I have to do is explain what is going to happen.  Those with eyes to see and ears to hear will understand:

They will pass these ‘Red Flag’ laws.

At first, most Americans will accept the definition of ‘un-stable.’

But, once the laws are in place, they will change that definition to apply to anyone who does not agree with the State.

They will then use those laws as an excuse to ‘deal with’ these ‘unstable’ people.

And you will live in a totalitarian State — a State that the Bible describes as, ‘The Beast!’

ALL of this is a total rejection of Natural Law and the founding principles and ideals of this nation.  It is a rejection and destruction of liberty.  It is tyranny — plain, pure and simple, and totally naked in its exposure to those who have eyes to see it.  But mind you, I say you will live in this State of tyranny because I won’t be here with you.  I will be dead.  Not gone, dead.  They will kill me — and they will kill me in your name!

*****

To those who do not believe that this is coming:

They have been saying that this is what they are going to do for over one hundred years!  They just count on the fact that you will reject the truth when you hear it.

*****

If me saying you will be part of this bothers you, then all I can say to you is:

“Come out of her, My People.”

 

BTW: For those who weren’t paying attention, Trump also called for laws to restrict free speech — even on social media and in the news media — as well as another look at ‘mental health.’  Now, before anyone goes and decides any of these things are good ideas, ask yourself: would I support any of this if Trump/Obama got to define what constitutes ‘unstable’ or ‘dangerous?’  Because this is exactly what these laws will do: they will allow the Part in power to define ‘unstable’ and ‘dangerous’ however they wish.  And, given the current trends, this means the Democrat Party will have this power forever and ever, because, now that they have seen they can get away with conducting an open coup, there will be nothing and no one to stop them from seizing total control of this nation…

 

APPLIED LOGIC: A Useful Political Profile

Over the coarse of my life, I have engaged a great many people in political discussions.  In the process of having these discussions, I have found that there is a pattern to the way a certain group of people think.  In most cases, when I encounter a person from this group, I can actually predict what they will think about a given subject, or how they will respond to a given question.  I can also predict that their reasoning process will exhibit certain traits.  In today’s environment, this is called ‘profiling,’ and it is often dismissed as being no better than stereotyping or labeling.  In fact, this is one of the traits common to the thinking of the people in the group I have in mind: they will almost always object to or reject anything they think of or consider to be stereotyping, labeling or profiling.  They will not examine it, they will just dismiss it out of hand.  The problem these people have is, if I can actually use this profile to predict their thinking/reactions with a high degree of accuracy, then it has value — because it is based in truth!

If we are honest with ourselves, and we actually take the time to look at the way we deal with a whole host of things, we will discover that we all use stereotypes/profiles to navigate our daily lives.  Each and every one of us do this.  There are no exceptions!  We just don’t realize that this is what we are doing.  Therefore, it would behoove us to spend a little time thinking about the stereotypes/profiles we use to help us judge others.  If they are highly predictive, then hold on to them.  However, if they often lead us into error, we should modify or discard them and replace them with more accurate stereotypes/profiles.

So, let’s have a discussion about this group of people I mentioned. Typically:

They tend to avoid or reject personal responsibility.

They tend to have a powerful sense of self, and of entitlement.

They tend to believe their opinion is the most obvious and the majority opinion in society.

They tend to believe their ideas are morally superior to others, and that this gives them a duty to ‘save’ people who do not understand the ‘truth’ of their beliefs.

They seldom have any reservations about the use of force against others — especially the use of force to ‘protect’ humanity from those who disagree with them.

They tend to see society in terms of groups, not individuals.

They tend to think of justice in terms of societal or group justice, not individual justice.

They tend to have no sense of fixed laws.  They will change the meaning of words and laws to fit whatever their agenda is at the moment.

They usually favor government control of their daily needs and lives.

They tend to reason by feelings rather than logic and right reasoning.

They tend to think that they are reasonable and very logical.

They often claim to be supported by or believe in ‘science.’

They may claim to believe in God, but, when questioned, they tend to exhibit no allegiance to whatever god in which they claim to believe.  Instead, they tend to exhibit characteristics of thinking they are their own gods.

They seldom recognize objective reality.

They tend to ignore or reject or even to re-write the historical record.

They tend to accept the face value of things.  They seldom bother to dig deeper than the surface.  They accept what they consider to be ‘obvious.’

They tend to lean heavily on the authority of their teachers, political leaders, media personalities and even entertainment heroes.  They seldom look for or accept original source material.

They tend to ignore or not allow the beliefs of others.  This often goes so far that they will tell people what they actually mean instead of letting others speak for themselves.  They put words in the mouths of others.

They tend to reject anything that doesn’t agree with them or contradicts their beliefs.

They tend to get stuck in feed-back loops, where they just keep saying the same things over and over again — believing that this will somehow make that thing true.

They tend to try to control any discussion they enter.  They will ask, but seldom answer questions.  they will answer questions that were not asked.  They will claim that others said things they did not say.  In general, they will try to manipulate others to say what they think and believe, then claim that this proves they are correct.

They tend to think in individual examples.  They do not have set principles or ideals to guide them.  They take things case by case, which often leads them into contradictions in their thinking/beliefs.

They tend to think they can ‘speak it into existence.’  In other words, they tend to think they can change reality by believing their ideas are true.

They tend to be blind to their own contradictions.  They do not engage in honest introspection.

They tend to accuse others of the things of which they are guilty.

They tend to reject any attempt to point out any of these things — often times, they will react violently. 

They will almost always resort to ad hominem (name calling) attacks when they are pushed to defend their positions.

This is just a partial list of the characteristic traits I have found in this group of people.  This list is just a list of those traits most often encountered.  Still, these traits are almost always found in these people.  By that, I do not mean this group will exhibit a few of these traits; I mean they will exhibit all but a few.  Often, they will exhibit every one of them.  Furthermore, once you know these traits, it becomes easy to ascertain whether or not you are dealing with one of these folks.  You just ask a few pre-determined questions and watch how they respond.  After a while, you will find there is a predictable pattern to them.  This means my ‘profile’ is highly predictive, which means it is based in truth and, therefore, useful.  I can use it to identify and help me deal with people of this particular mindset.

BTW: there are several ‘labels’ that have been assigned to the people in this group.  Some of them they have even assigned to themselves.  I am not going to tell you what any of these labels are.  I’ll let you figure it out for yourselves.  But note: if you figure it out, it is probably because you already held a similar ‘profile.’  What’s more, it is likely that a great many of the people in this group will not only recognize themselves, they will unjustly and inaccurately assign all of these things to other people — which is one of the traits I have listed 😉

 

AS AN ASIDE:

One of the themes that comes up almost every time I try to have a discussion with someone from the group I mentioned above is a violent reaction to being placed in this group.  Even though they exhibit nearly or even all of the traits I listed, they seldom identify as being part of the group, and they never accept anyone trying to tell them they are in this group.  This is very telling.  It means that — on some level — they know they are part of the group and they do not like it.  Which also tells us something about them.  Why don’t they want to be in this group?  And, if they know they are in it and do not like it, why don’t they change so they can get out of it?  Why do they insist on denying the truth instead?  These are honest questions, and the answers will lead you right back to the list above — like a feed-back loop 😉