I look at the lawlessness in the U.S. today and I wonder whether or not we still understand the concept of ‘The Rule of Law?’ And, if we know what it is, do we still embrace it? Or have we abandoned it for the rule of ‘kings?’ I ask these questions because, if we actually lived under “The Rule of Law,” there would be a great many people currently being trumpeted as heroes who would either be in jail or executed! Yes, executed! Well, I — for one — still believe in and embrace ‘The Rule of Law,’ and I would like to see our laws against treason, rebellion and sedition enforced. Here are just a few examples of what this would mean today:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
I think this one is extremely serious, and that anyone in the highest levels of government found guilty of treason should be hung in short order — and hung publicly. So, who might be guilty of treason?
Well, according to the law, anyone who gives aid or comfort to an enemy of the United States is guilty of treason. The Muslim Brotherhood is such an enemy, and so are ISIS and Al Qaeda. Then there is Iran, which is most definitely an enemy of the United States. President Obama and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, both gave aid and comfort to all of these enemies. The evidence supporting my accusations is actually in the public record, so I do not want to hear anyone objecting to my assertions. I have just stated a fact: legally speaking, both Obama and Hillary Clinton have committed treason against this nation and they should be charged, tried and — if convicted — executed for treason!
Then there are these next two laws, which are so similar that I will handle them together:
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
§2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Rebellion against U.S. authority or its laws… Folks, this is talking about sanctuary cities, illegal alien voting and all the ANTIFA and ‘Occupy’ movements we have spreading throughout this nation, as well as every individual and organization supporting them. These laws can and should see George Soros and all those like him who have been funding the illegal invasion of this nation in jail and fined into poverty. But more than that, they should also be used against Google, Face Book, You Tube, Twitter and a host f other social media outlets that have proven they are giving material support to this lawlessness either by direct donation or by allowing them to use their platforms.
Now, I understand that there will be people who will claim that the riots are covered by the First Amendment, but they are not. No act is covered by a protection of speech and press, nor does the First Amendment protect anyone who uses speech or the press to call for rebellion and/or sedition. The same applies to those who would claim that there is no ‘use of force’ being applied in the prevention of the enforcement of U.S. law. Here again, this objection would not apply:
Power, violence, compulsion, or constraint exerted upon or against a person or thing. Power dynamically considered, that is, in motion or in action; constraining power, compulsion; strength directed to an end. Commonly the word occurs in such connections as to show that unlawful or wrongful action is meant, e.g., forcible entry.
Power statically considered, that is, at rest, or latent, but capable of being called into activity upon occasion for its exercise. Efficacy; legal validity. This is the meaning when we say that a statute or a contract is in force.
Reasonable force is that degree of force that is appropriate and not inordinate in defending one’s person or property. A person who employs such force is justified in doing so and is neither criminally liable nor civilly liable in tort for the conduct.
Deadly Force is utilized when a person intends to cause death or serious bodily harm or when he or she recognizes personal involvement in the creation of a substantial risk that death or bodily harm will occur.
This is the legal definition of force, and the things we are seeing in our country most definitely meet the terms of this definition. Therefore, everyone involved in the examples I listed (and many I did not) is guilty of either rebellion and/or sedition and should be charged and prosecuted accordingly. This would include all high level political officials — elected or otherwise, as well as all members of any board of a guilty corporation and all members of any media organization involved in writing, editing, approving or delivering a story that promotes such actions. And yes! I understand that — at this point — I am talking about pretty much gutting the entire ‘main stream’ media. But I would go one step further by invoking this law, as well:
§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Let me make this one short and sweet: anyone and everyone who has had a hand in this with-hunt against President Trump is guilty of advocating the overthrow of a duly elected President. Ergo, they are guilty of advocating the overthrow of the U.S. government — period! And I do mean everyone. Yes, this would pretty much include the entire elected branch of the Democrat Party, as well as everyone at the DNC. It would also include the majority of the U.S. media. But it would also apply to many people in the GOP, as well. And I do not want to hear from anyone who is going to argue that Trump is guilty of collusion or obstruction of justice.
We know — as in it is an established and proven fact — that the entire ‘case’ against Trump was fabricated by people inside our government for the purposes of removing a duly elected President (this is the very definition of subversion), using a dossier known to not only be fake, but also to be the product of foreign intelligence operatives and to have been paid for by Hillary Clinton (again, the very definition of treason and subversion). What’s more, there is sufficient evidence to implicate President Obama and several high level members of his Administration as well as high level people within the FBI, DOJ and U.S. Intelligence Community, as well.
I am on record as not being a fan of Trump. I’m still not a supporter. But I know that he is not guilty of the things he has been charged with , mostly because, if he were, he would have been impeached for them by now — and rightly so. At the same time, I know — because even the corrupt media has printed the proof — that Hillary Clinton and a cabal of other people inside the U.S. government paid foreign intelligence operatives to create a fake report about Trump, which they then used to perpetrate a fraud upon the FISA Court so they could create the false accusations, which were then used to justify a fraudulent investigation lead by people who had clear biases that should have precluded them from ever participating in the investigation. Therefore, no ‘obstruction of justice’ charge can legally be made to stick because the whole ‘investigation’ was fraudulent on its face. One cannot obstruct justice when it is actually obstructing a criminal act masquerading as ‘justice.’
So, yes! I would charge the entire elected Democrat body in Congress, everyone in the investigation, the media and a great many people in the GOP with subversion — possibly even treason (after all, this helps many enemies of the U.S. by weakening Trump and strengthening those enemies in other areas of the world).
Now, before I close, I acknowledge that there will be many who not only object, but who will dismiss my arguments. They will think my call to enforce our laws too be too broad, politically motivated, or even illegal. And all such people — no matter their intentions — will be furthering the destruction of what little ‘Rule of Law’ remains in this nation. You see, there is a legal way to advance everything these people want to do in this country. They can push for laws to be passed — properly; they can propose amendments to the Constitution; and they can call for an Article V Convention, but they are not doing any of this. Instead, they are violating U.S. law, and that cannot be allowed to go unpunished for, if the people who are doing all of this are not punished to the fullest extent of our laws, the message that will have been sent is that they never will be. They will then conclude — and rightfully so — that they are above the law. At that point, this nation will fall into dictatorship. I know this as surely as I know the sun will rise tomorrow. I know it because it has ever been the history of man. If there is nothing to stop ambitious people but the extent of their own ambition, they will exercise that ambition by taking everything they can possibly take. And, in this case, if we show them they can get away with treason and an attempted coup, then they will do it again and again until — eventually — they establish a One-Party rule in the United States, and that, my dear reader, is a dictatorship in the same category as Hitler, Stalin and Mao — and it will have the same result, too.