I often wonder how many people in the Federal government have read the Constitution. And, of the few who have read it, how many of them actually understand it? More to the point: hoe many understand their duties and obligations under the Constitution?
Here is the story that caused me to write the title to this post:
OK, let’s take a moment to get a few things clear in our minds:
1 — They are not ‘un-documented immigrants,’ they are ILLEGAL ALIENS!
2 — An ILLEGAL ALIEN is NOT a U.S. citizen.
3 — The representatives of our State and Federal governments are supposed to represent the American People — NOT ILLEGALS!
4 — ONLY U.S. citizens are supposed to be able to vote.
Now, to the U.S. Constitution:
Article IV
Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Now, to the Founders’ dictionary, the Webster’s Dictionary of 1828:
REPUB’LIC, noun [Latin respublica; res and publica; public affairs.]
1. A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person. Yet the democracies of Greece are often called republics.
2. Common interest; the public. [Not in use.]
Now, apply a little logic here. If Newsome is allowing ILLEGALS to vote, and he is using tax payer money to support ILLEGALS over actual American citizens, that is not a Republic!
Back to the Webster’s 1828 Dictionary once more:
INVA’SION, noun s as z. [Latin invasio, from invado. See Invade.]
1. A hostile entrance into the possessions of another; particularly, the entrance of a hostile army into a country for the purpose of conquest or plunder, or the attack of a military force. The north of England and south of Scotland were for centuries subject to invasion each from the other. The invasion of England by William the Norman, was in 1066.
2. An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation.
3. Attack of a disease; as the invasion of the plague, in Egypt.
Here is where we have to use logic. We think an invasion must be by a hostile army to be a real invasion, but that is not what the definition says. The definition says ‘particularly,’ meaning that this is the most common, but not the only understanding of this term. In other words, it is not logically necessary to be invaded by a hostile army. Any group of people forcefully entering into your territory for the purpose of plunder or conquest is an invasion. Therefore,
NEWSOME IS AIDING AND ABETTEING A HOSTILE INVASION OF CALIFORNIA!
Back to Article IV, Section IV:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;
Newsome is in violation of the guarantee of a republic form of government, and is actively participating in an invasion of the State of California and, by association, the greater United States. It is not a stretch of logic or law to conclude that:
PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO REMOVE NEWSOME AND ALL THOSE IN GOVERNMENT SUPPORTING AND ASSISTING HIM IN HIS ATTACK ON CALIFORNIA AND THE UNITED STATES!
But no one even considers upholding the law. Why? Because they don’t really care about the law — not really. As long as they can get what THEY want, the rest is all school yard squabbles. Which is why evil usually wins:
BECAUSE ‘GOOD’ IS TOO COWARDLY TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
Which stands in stark contrast to our Founders, who did what was right and trusted the result to YHWH:
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
In case you might be wondering, those are not appeals to deism. Webster, a devout Christian, defines the term thusly:
PROV’IDENCE, noun [Latin providentia.]
3. In theology, the care and superintendence which God exercises over his creatures. He that acknowledges a creation and denies a providence involves himself in a palpable contradiction; for the same power which caused a thing to exist is necessary to continue its existence. Some persons admit a general providence but deny a particular providence not considering that a general providence consists of particulars. A belief in divine providence is a source of great consolation to good men. By divine providence is often understood God himself.
The Founders knew this. They were appealing to YHWH, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. As a People, we no longer care to do the same, yet we expect the same result they received. How deceived this wicked and evil generation… 🙁
–B3A