Monthly Archives: March 2022

LAWLESS LOGIC, NATURAL LAW

The Real Lesson In The Will Smith Slap

5 Comments

We now live in a society that refuses to accept personal responsibility. If you doubt me, stop and think — really think! Who is most often being punished in our society today: the people who are blatantly breaking the law and flaunting it in our faces, or those who uphold the notion of personal responsibility and who seek to hold others accountable? If you are intellectually honest about this question, you will have to reach the same conclusion I did:

We are punishing those who still embrace personal responsibility while rewarding those who have not only rejected it, they refuse to even acknowledge that individual accountability is a thing.

We see it in the way we let the courts remove any accountability when we malign someone who can be labeled as a ‘public figure.’ Folks, it is a violation of Natural Law to assert that a Natural Right is forfeit simply because you are in the public eye. Honestly, in today’s age of social media fame, this could and probably should apply to anyone and everyone on the Internet expressing an opinion — and silence is the expression of an opinion (do the math on that one yourself).

Our Founders did not exempt the press from the consequences of what it published. This is because our Founders were much wiser and much more civilized than we are today. You see, there is a thing that is still in the common law (but our judges refuse to acknowledge) called ‘fighting words.’ In short, if you say something that a reasonable person would expect to illicit a violent response, it is not protected speech! Nor is it considered ‘assault’ when a person openly insults another person, and the person who was insulted whips the insulter’s rear end. That is called ‘the law of the jungle,’ and our Social Contract does not and was never meant to subvert this law. If a person ignores their duties and responsibilities toward others under the Social Contract (which is what they do when they use fighting words), then that persona cannot turn around and claim the protections of that Social Contract when they get what they deserve. They have violated the Social Contract, so they are no longer protected by it.

NOTE: To hold an insulted person to the contract when they have been attacked by someone who has violated the contract is also a violation of the Social Contract.

Did you notice how everyone immediately jumped to the idea of charging Will Smith with assault? By what authority? Since our courts have ignored the common law rule that allows us to pummel someone who uses fighting words to insult us, the courts have no authority to then hold the insulted person to the terms of the law. When they break the contract that creates the very authority by which they broke it, the courts cede their authority as a court of law. In short, the courts have invalidated themselves, but we don’t care because we refuse to take the responsibility that comes with acknowledging that truth.

Now, it’s true: we could sue the insulter for slander and libel, and we should be allowed to do that to the media. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from the consequences of what we say. But then, because of the courts’ perversions of our Social Contract, we are doubly victimized when we sue our assailant. This is because we now have to expend time and money to recover something the courts are more likely to refuse to recognize: our damages. The courts like to assert that no damages are owed because we suffered no tangible loss, but they will happily collect damages for themselves from the accused in the form of fines. This is actually an indication of just how much of a mess we have allowed our rulers to make of our system. When the victim can recover no damages, but the courts can collect from the assailant, the system is irrevocably broken and needs to be dissolved. How did things become such a mess? By the perversion of Natural Law. This includes the rejection of holding people responsible for their actions, but that includes our refusal to act against those officials who first refused to uphold the terms of our Social Contract.

If we were to hold people accountable for their actions, the media would be much less of a problem as they would be sued into bankruptcy. Corporations would lose their legal protections, which would result in their destruction. Both would act more responsibly as a result. Government would also be nuderd because it could no longer make false assertions such as, ‘you deserve‘ or ‘you’re a victim,’ then use them to justify government over-reach. If you refuse to work for your own support, you deserve nothing and are a victim of no one and nothing but yourself and your own sloth. If you commit a violent crime and your victim defends themselves, you deserve nothing from your victim. More than this, there would be no attempt to excuse a criminal as being a victim of their past, which would end the practice of filing charges against the criminal’s victim when they defend themselves. Today, because of the refusal to assign accountability where it belongs, our courts would charge the victim who defends themselves and award damages to the person who was committing the crime. It is all lawlessness, and more than the law of Man, it is lawlessness in the eyes of the Creator, under Whose Laws our entire system was based.

Oh, and one more thing. I do not care how immoral Will Smith’s lifestyle is. That does not change what is right and wrong. To excuse lawlessness because the victim lives an immoral lifestyle is a fallacy. It is the fallacy of ‘and you, too,’ or ‘an appeal to hypocrisy’ (different ways of naming the same thing). A fallacy is a violation of the rules of logic, which is a violation of Natural Law. So, please, don’t talk to me about how immorally Smith lives. That has nothing to do with reacting to fighting words.

Now, if you want to debate whether or not the whole event was staged…. Well, now that is a different subject, and I’m all ears (mostly because I am very suspicious that this is exactly what it was: a stunt to gain publicity for a dying event).

ADDENDUM 3-29-2022

This is what I mean about free speech needing to suffer the consequences. I do not think Disney should be silenced. It should be free to say whatever it wishes. However, when it openly and intentionally lies like this:

Disney blatantly lies about Florida bill protecting parents’ rights — and the backlash is swift

Corporate protections should be lost and the CEO, Board and ALL stock holders should be open to personal law suit — and yes, even by the State legislature and governor who passed the Bill. What’s more, the stock holders should be allowed to sue the Board and all management types — personally. They have breached their fiduciary responsibility to their share holders, and they should pay the cost of having done so.

The point is simple: speech should be free from censorship, but not free from the consequences of what is said.

CONSPIRACY THEORY, EXPOSING THE HIDDEN HAND

Hypocrisy Through Willful Ignorance

I was just thinking about how many times I have been dismissed by ignorant people who called me a ‘conspiracy theorist.’ Many of them will then turn around and decry the evil of Socialism, and rightfully so. But there is a common thread here. They embrace the truth that Socialism is evil because — even if it is just listening to talking heads repeating other peoples’ research — they have actually done some semblance of research into the issue. However, when you bring them evidence that some or much of what they think they know is based in lies, or you try to show them how they have been fooled and why, they will reject you. Why? Because they are ignorant. Now stupid, ignorant: they do not know what I know. Well, I do not fault them for their ignorance, but I certainly hold them in contempt for their stubborn refusal to research for themselves before they make a judgment on me or the information I have tried to share with them.

Proverbs 18:13

One who gives an answer before he hears,

It is foolishness and shame to him.

[I strongly suggest reading the entire Proverb]

I am aware that many who read my work are politically orientated, and of a ‘Conservative’ bent. I am also aware that many of those people have trouble with my ‘conspiracy theories.’ So, let me try to make my point this way:

One of the problems with those who support the lies of ‘Socialism’ is that they believe it is moral to take from one and give to another — where the ‘other’ is usually themselves. At it’s heart, the problem with Socialism is that it embraces a violation of Natural Law. First, you cannot reap a reward where you have not sewn effort, but this is exactly what the average supporter of Socialism seeks: gain without cost; reward without risk; money without work. It violates the universal constant commonly expressed as:

“There is no such thing as a free lunch.”

Most of those who read my work understand this, and usually, they understand it because they have done something to teach themselves that it is true. They have either studied it, seen it in practice, or researched it in history. However they have done it, they have gathered enough truth to draw the only rational conclusion. So, why do so many of these same people refuse to put in the effort necessary to prove or disprove to themselves the truth of what I try to share and explain? Well, sadly, the answer is simple: they are much like the Socialist who wants reward without effort. Only, in this case:

They want the comfort that comes with the certainty of their beliefs without the cost of having to test their beliefs.

As I see it, we are all guilty of doing this in some way, so, to some degree, we are all hypocrites. Most don’t seem to care about that, but I try — hard — to fight against it. It has made me much more humble as I have come to learn I actually don’t know or understand as much as I once thought I did. It has also made me much more gracious toward others. If I don’t have the time or desire to research something, why should I expect others to do so? But then, I am learning to keep my mouth shut when and where I realize I am ignorant. If only the majority of other hypocrites could or would do the same…

LESSONS IN LOGIC

The ‘Bigger Picture’ Behind The Twitter-Babylon Bee-Rachel Levin Story

2 Comments

I will try to make this as short and easy to understand as possible. We will start with the story about Twitter banning the Babylon Bee:

Babylon Bee founder and Not the Bee CEO Adam Ford has been locked out of Twitter for sharing a Babylon Bee joke calling Rachel Levine a male

OK, now, the first thing I want to do is walk you through the logic here. Let’s just follow science — and by that, I mean real science — by remembering some basic biology we should have all learned about from our days in those government indoctrination camps commonly called ‘the public school system:’

XX chromosomes = FEMALE!

XY chromosomes = MALE!

Period — end of discussion (unless you are irrational, delusional or depraved)

Therefore, all rational people recognize that — no matter what he does to our injects into his body, or how he dresses, this is a male!

This means that Twitter has punished the Babylon Bee for making an observation that is true by definition!

Now, for those who do not know logic, it is utterly irrational to argue with a definition. If you do so, you demonstrate to the world, by your own actions, that you have renounced the use of reason, which — according to most of those who do this — excludes you from the majority of definitions of ‘human.’ If we could cross-examine them and get honest answers from them, I suspect this is exactly what we would find: that the people running twitter have just excluded themselves from their own definition of ‘human.’

OK, that was actually the fun (i.e. snide, mocking) part of this post. Now,

HERE IS THE PART TO WHICH YOU NEED TO PAY ATTENTION!

A definition is an un-breakable rule of logic. If something is true ‘by definition,’ then it is true — period. No one can claim differently and still be operating inside the rule of logic and reason.

To claim that a man is a woman simply because he says he is a woman is a contradiction of definitions. Even if he has surgery and injects hormones to alter his body, he is still a man. He still has XY chromosomes. Therefore, by definition, he is a male! Asserting that a man is actually a woman is a contradiction — again, that is also by definition:

contradiction (ˌkɒntrəˈdɪkʃən) n

1. the act of going against; opposition; denial

2. a declaration of the opposite or contrary

3. a statement that is at variance with itself (often in the phrase a contradiction in terms)

4. conflict or inconsistency, as between events, qualities, etc

5. a person or thing containing conflicting qualities

6. (Logic) logic a statement that is false under all circumstances; necessary falsehood

In logic, a contradiction is also known as an absurdity. I know it gets old, but — by definition:

absurdity noun

1. The state or quality of being absurd or inconsistent with obvious truth, reason, or sound judgment; want of rationality or common sense: as, the absurdity of superstition; absurdity of conduct.

2. That which is absurd; an absurd action, statement, argument, custom, etc.: as, the absurdities of men; your explanation involves a gross absurdity.

Now, in logic, we have a saying:

“From an absurdity, all things follow.”

That means, once a person convinces you to believe an absurdity, then literally anything and everything becomes true. Now, I want you to pay close attention to this next quote, because the man who said these words was in the same exact wheelhouse we’re in now, and he was driving at the very same point I am trying to make:

“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

–Voltaire

For those who may need help connecting the dots here, the people who tell you a man can become a woman are the very same people who convinced a great many of our neighbors, friends and family to demand lock-downs, experimental jabs, the destruction of our economy, etc…. They can convince you that it is not only a ‘moral’ thing to teach 5 year olds about sex, but that it is perfectly normal for them to have relations with adults. They can tell you that the un-born child is not a person until they are actually 3 years old, and that it is not murder to kill them up to that age (don’t balk, one of the leading ‘medical ethicists’ in the U.S. has made that very argument). In fact, if they can convince you that a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man, then they can convince you that all lives are not equal, and that white lives are actually inferior — and that they hold the moral high ground for saying so. All of the things we’ve seen coming from these people represent lawlessness, chaos and destruction, and they are all atrocities!

But there is an even greater point to be made here. The people who are pushing others to commit these atrocities believe that the ends they seek justify whatever means they need to achieve them. In other words, they do not see any moral problems with whatever atrocities they cause or commit — just as long as they achieve their goals. In fact, many of these people believe that the ‘moral’ thing to do is to kill off some 7.4 billion people. You see, if a man can become a woman, then that’s not murder, its ‘saving the planet.’ And, no, I am not exaggerating. There are people who have argued this point and are currently working toward this goal.

This brings us to another quote by another philosopher who also understood everything we’re discussing here:

“If god does not exist everything is permitted.”

– Dostoevsky

Yes, for those of you with the sharper pencils in the class, I am saying that the people pushing these absurdities on society are Godless. In fact, many of them openly assert that there is no God. Sadly, they do not realize that the claim that there is no God is — itself — an absurdity. But then there are those depraved individuals who push absurdity and promote atrocity who would claim they most certainly do believe in god. Sadly, they are correct. It’s just that the god they worship is themselves (and, yes, that’s right: this is yet another absurdity).

I suppose no one said it better than this man:

Romans 1:28

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a depraved mind, to do those things that are not proper,

(It’s actually a part of Natural Law, folks, which puts it square in the focus of this blog 😉 )

**********************************

A PERSONAL REQUEST

I have a personal aversion to self-promotion. It is the primary reason I have not yet started a video or pod cast. So, if you find this post to be of any value in helping you to better understand our world, or to make sense out of the events of the day, please like it and share it with your friends. Thank you, B3A

CONSPIRACY THEORY, IN THE HEADLINES, The New World Order

TRANSLATING PROGRESSIVISM: Biden’s Warning About A Putin Cyber Attack

4 Comments

Have you seen this story yet? If so, do not assume that it can be taken at face value:

Biden warns of possible cyberattack from Russia on critical infrastructure: ‘It’s coming’

Before I explain why I am trepidatious about this story, let me remind you of something FDR once said and which I have come to regard as the starting point for evaluating everything I see, read and hear coming from our government and its media apparatus:

OK, here is how I do the math on this story. I start by assuming I can take FDR to the bank here, which then means I need to also assume that whatever is about to happen regarding Biden’s ‘warning’ has been planned. Then, add in the fact that our government has a well-established history of conducting false-flag operations against its own people. Finally, I factor in the fact that what is happening in Ukraine has nothing to do with what the media and either the U.S. or Russian government is saying about it publicly (remember, the entire Democrat Party and much of the Republican leadership is dirty in Ukraine). So, taking all of this and crunching the numbers, I get the following as the most likely answer:

The U.S. government is about to launch a cyber attack on the U.S. and blame it on Putin!

Crazy, right? Why would our own government do such a thing? Well, if you haven’t ignored all the voices trying to warn you about the New World Order/Global Reset/Build Back Better/Agenda 21-2030 Agenda, then you can probably answer that question for yourself. However, for those who may just now be trying to catch up, it is this simple:

‘They’ need to destroy our economy and the U.S. $!

Why? So that they can create such a ‘crisis’ of fear that we will not only accept, but we will beg for their ‘solution.’ The problem is, ‘They’ are creating the problem specifically so they can sell us the solution. What is ‘Their’ Solution? Nothing less than Global or National Socialism camouflaged as ‘Public-Private Partnerships’ or ‘Stake-Holder Capitalism.’

Before I explain what these terms mean, I want to remind you of something:

Do you remember how ‘They’ created the economic crisis of 2008-2009? If not, watch this and keep in mind the context is ‘a false crisis created to force changes you and I would otherwise resist:

What was forced on us back in 2008-2009? Do you remember TARP? Or how it was used to seize private property and force private corporations to do the government’s bidding? If not, you have a lot of catching-up to do. Get busy. As for the rest of us ‘conspiracy’ types, we understand that all of this started with Woodrow Wilson and was then perfected by his star pupils in Germany:

“The war made possible for us the solution of a whole series of problems that could never have been solved in normal times.“

–Josef Goebbels

The notion of using a crisis to push an agenda the masses do not want is actually older than Wilson. Wilson just formalized it into a ‘scientific’ process and the NAZI’s perfected that process. But it started with William James and his idea of ‘The Moral Equivalent of War.‘ Since the time of this idea, there have been people looking to create crisis that have the same power to galvanize the People and make them willing to ‘sacrifice’ for the cause so they can use the crisis to push their agenda. Jimmy Carter did it back during the ‘oil crisis’ of the 1970’s.

However, we need to understand the oil crisis of the 70’s was forced on the U.S. the exact same way it is being forced upon us today: by people refusing to allow us to drill our own oil. We also need to understand that the people who refuse to let us use our own oil know what they are doing. They know that the law of supply and demand works. This is why, when the price of gas gets high enough to threaten their power, they always ask other oil-producing countries to increase their production, or they release oil from the nation’s strategic reserves. The only conclusion that can be reasonably drawn from their actions is that they are intentionally creating the crisis. From there, it is an easy thing to conclude they are doing it for their own reasons and not the good of the People.

So, going back to Biden’s ‘warning’ about Putin: the agenda is the reset of the entire global economic system. The problem is, if it was honestly and openly explained to them, in full, the American People would refuse to accept this agenda. So, ‘They’ need to create such a disruption in the global economy that the People of the world will not only accept ‘Their’ solution, but we will also accept the surrender of our rights and way of life in the process. We are already suffering from rising inflation and supply shortages (both of which have been intentionally manufactured). If they can also disrupt the nations internet-based economy and infrastructure, then they can create the ‘pain’ necessary to convince us to accept their solution. But ‘They’ can’t just do this to us; ‘They’ need a bogeyman to blame for it. The idea here is to avoid exposing their guilt by giving the People an external ‘enemy’ upon which to focus their fear and anger.

The goal is simple, folks: they need to find a path that allows them to enslave the world without having to fight the world. ‘They’ are not really a big group of people, and ‘They’ are not that powerful, either. ‘They’ can pull all of this off because ‘They’ have seized the organs of control over Western Society. ‘They’ have been planning and working toward this goal for decades. Now, they see their opportunity to finally achieve their dreams. If you understand this, but also understand that ‘They’ are not monolithic, either (they have different, competing factions within themselves), all of this will start to make perfect sense. You just have to accept that it is possible, then start looking for the breadcrumbs. If you do these two things, you will find they are not breadcrumbs, they are entire bakery truckloads of bread!

But then, ‘They’ know that human nature is such that ‘They’ can count on 80%+ of people taking the easy way out and accepting ‘Their’ lies — including the lie that all of us trying to warn others are all just conspiracy nuts:

**********************************

ADDITIONAL ‘CONNECTIONS’

Before Biden Warned of a Russian Cyberattack, He Gave Putin a Target List

Not only does this story reveal Biden identified 16 critical areas within the U.S. that are ‘vulnerable’ to Russian cyber attacks (telegraphing the areas ‘They’ plan to hit in the process), but he also implied that any ‘private’ entity that is taken down by this attack will be a victim because there is no government control over cyber defense. This is the very type of language ‘They’ use to start building a narrative that ends in a demand for more government take-over of the private sector. It is an easy part of the formula to spot, you just have to learn what you need to look for, then start looking for it.

The Never-Ending Crisis Cycle

**********************************

A PERSONAL REQUEST

I have a personal aversion to self-promotion. It is the primary reason I have not yet started a video or pod cast. So, if you find this post to be of any value in helping you to better understand our world, or to make sense out of the events of the day, please like it and share it with your friends. Thank you, B3A

IN THE HEADLINES, The Progressives

Kamala Harris Gives Us A Peak Behind The Curtain

Have you seen this video clip yet? If not, please watch it, then I’ll explain what you just heard but no one will tell you.

Continue reading Kamala Harris Gives Us A Peak Behind The Curtain →