Daily Archives: September 8, 2021

CONNECTING THE DOTS

CONNECTING THE DOTS: Changing Of Definitions Is Evidence Of The Hidden hand

2 Comments

I am starting to wonder whether or not I am doing any good here. I see and understand the evidence for ‘conspiracy theories’ everywhere, but I can’t find a way to get others to see it. No! It is not because I’m delusional or the evidence isn’t there, because I’m not and it is. No, I’m beginning to believe it’s because we are living in the days of the Great Delusion foretold by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2. Here, let me show you yet another of the indirect signs of The Hidden Hand at work in our world today.

Before I share the links that demonstrate how the definitions of words are being changed in real time, let me first mention why this is so important. I like to point out when I make an assertion or argument based on or in the definition of a word. This is because definitions are one of the foundational blocks of logic and reason. In a sane world, one cannot argue with a definition and, even in this insane world, where definitions are changed to support political agendas, you still cannot argue with the definition — you just have to know what the word meant before it was changed. This way, you can hold to the original meaning of the word and show why you reject the meaning that was changed to support whatever agenda had the definition of that word changed. However, if you do not know that the definition of the word has been changed… Well, in that case, we all end up believing lies which, if it goes on long enough, can and will destroy civil society — which is what is happening to us now.

By the way: changing a definition simply to support your claim, assertion or agenda is a fallacy: a mistake in logic. It does not make you right, it just means you are not only wrong, but also dishonest.

Now, let me show you how others have already noticed how definitions are being changed to suit a political agenda (and please, take note of which agenda is always being aided by these changes):

FLASHBACK: Google Changed the Definition of Fascism

Someone put this reminder up on reddit and it’s one we should keep in mind as the right-wing is silenced. Google changed the definition of Fascism from “centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition” to “right wing system of government and social organization” this year.

Now, when we look at the video and the story above, we will learn that all publishing companies as well as Google must be working in conjunction to change the definition of Fascism at the same time. This requires a coordination that, in a free market, would not happen. It also suggest that this coordination not only exists, but it is actively working to support the Left-Wing agenda while seeking to undermine and/or silence anyone thought to be on the Right.

By the way: This is a violation of U.S. RICO Laws, as well as campaign finance laws – not that anyone cares anymore.

Here’s another example:

Oxford dictionaries change ‘sexist’ and outdated definitions of the word ‘woman’

(CNN)Even the dictionary can be sexist and out of date, especially when it comes to how a “woman” is described.

This statement by CNN actually indicates bias, as it is impossible for a book that merely provides the meaning of words to be ‘sexist.’ But there are more indications that these definitions were changed to satisfy a political agenda. In fact, this excerpt from the article admits that they changed the definitions specifically to appease a feminist agenda:

“We have expanded the dictionary coverage of ‘woman’ with more examples and idiomatic phrases which depict women in a positive and active manner,” according to a statement from OUP. “We have ensured that offensive synonyms or senses are clearly labelled as such and only included where we have evidence of real world usage.”

The reasons given in this article are — by definition — subjective. They are also political in nature, as they belie the very foundational belief system of the feminist movement. This fact then indicates that the Oxford Dictionary made these changes to support the feminist agenda.

Here are three more stories:

Merriam-Webster Dictionary Quietly Changes Definition of ‘Vaccine’ to Include COVID-19 mRNA Injection

The CDC quietly changed the definition of “vaccination” so as to fit the political narrative and I’m pretty sure that’s not how science is supposed to work.

The Definition of “Pandemic” has been Altered

Here is one of the clearest indications of coordination between academia, business and government to push a political agenda we have seen yet. First, academia (Miriam-Webster’s Dictionary) changes the definitions of vaccines so that the mRNA injections will meet the definition. Next, the CDC, a private corporation, does the same thing. Finally, the WHO, a world governing body, changes the definition of a pandemic. All of these show international coordination to push the same, unified agenda. And some of these changes were made prior to COVID-19, indicating that this — at the very least — was not motivated by any altruistic desire to save people. It was in the works long before COVID.

Once again, this is all illegal, but it is also the definition of Fascism. Ooops, sorry, no. When the characteristics of Fascism spread so that they become borderless (i.e. global, as we see here), then that is the definition of Communism. Either way, same poison, just a broader application of that poison: from a nation to the world.

And people wonder why we ‘conspiracy theorist’ are so convinced we’re correct about a group of people working in coordination behind the scenes to control the world. I mean, the signs are all over the place. You just need to know what to look for. It’s the same way with belief in YHWH. Once you read the Scriptures and know what to look for, you will see the signs of His Hand in history. They’re everywhere. Only those who make a conscience decision to reject all possibility of a global cabal (or YHWH) and then decide to ignore any and all evidence — direct or indirect — that they are wrong can continue not to see they are wrong. Folks, that does not make the ‘conspiracy theorist delusional, it makes the conspiracy deniers delusional. Seriously, think about it for a bit. You might discover that I’m not as crazy as you may have once thought.

LESSONS IN LOGIC

LESSONS IN LOGIC: Hanlon’s Razor Does Not Apply To Politics

Hanlon’s Razor goes something like this:

“Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

This is a valid principle — for most things. However, when it comes to politics Hanlon’s Razor does not apply. When it comes to politics, FDR’s Maxim is a much better guideline:

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happened, you can bet it was planned that way.“

Now, before anyone starts to argue with my assertion that FDR’s Maxim is a better guide to understanding political events than Hanlon’s Razor, let me explain why I said it.

First, in this day and age: to assume the people in power are there by accident is a mistake. It underestimates the degree of concentration of control over our social, economic and political systems, and the level of competence that was necessary to concentrate that control. Therefore, it is safer to assume that the people we see in politics — even if not competent, themselves — are under the control of highly competent people. Just because we do not see those people does not mean they do not exist, or that they are working from a plan — because they do, and they are.

This brings us to the second pint in favor of FDR’s Maxim: the people who have concentrated control over our world actually study how to do so. They study the work of people such as Edward Bernays, Walter Lippmann, John Calhoun, Martin Seligman, Stanley Milgram and many more. The goal has always been how to manipulate and control people so efficiently, they not only don’t notice they are being controlled, but they actually participate in it. They have even written about how they can do these things without anyone realizing they are doing it. That’s what this book is all about:

And this one is about how to use the media to help in the effort:

So is this one, and it is written by the author who is credited for the invention of propaganda and modern political ‘spin:’

And this one explains how to use propaganda (the author is the same man Goebbels credited for teaching the NAZI’s how to use propaganda):

This book was written by one of the ‘They:’ a man inside this groups of controllers, and it explains what their plans are and how they are doing it. It even reveals that the two Parties in America are actually one Party pretending to be two, for the purposes of providing outlets for public hostility toward the ultimate goal:

This book uses public sources to reveal the group behind the scenes and explain what they seek to do, and how:

And this one uses hundreds of public records to reveal who the people are controlling our society; to explain how they do it; and to illustrate examples of their progress and success. This is a well-sourced, wide-ranging expose of something most people refuse to believe is actually happening:

These are just a small sampling of the many essays and books that have either been published by or about the people who work behind the scenes. These people are trying to re-make Mankind: both our nature, as well as our society. They can be known. They have never been totally secret. They can’t help but boast about their plans. You just have to know where to find the information, take time to read it, then accept it as the truth: they mean what they say and say what they mean and are in the process of making it all happen.

Just think how the world might have been different had it followed this advice in regard to the mad-man who wrote this crazy conspiracy book:

So, given that all the people who wrote or were written about in these books have all been in or connected to the U.S. Government and the social controls it employs, which is actually the more plausible solution to the problem:

That people such as these are just stupid?

Or that everything they do has been carefully planned and executed?

Another razor — Ockham’s Razor, not only does apply here, it makes that calculus fairly easy.

Assuming all other things are equal, then the simplest and most likely answer to perceived stupidity is not that we have elected a never ending stream of stupid and incompetent people, but that there is a hidden agenda which actually makes sense of everything we perceive as stupid and incompetent.

Which brings us to my last question:

What sort of agenda could make sense of all the apparently stupid, incompetent and senseless things we see in politics?

[I have answers for you, but I warn you: You’re not going to like them 🙂 ]