Are you Pro TEA Party or Pro Tyranny, Slavery/Indentured Servitude, Lawlessness and Licentiousness?  Yes, I understand that it is fallacious to argue “You’re either for me or against me”  — except when there are only two sides to an issue.  You can either be for liberty or control; for the law or lawlessness; for slavery or servitude; for morality of licentiousness.  You cannot be ‘neutral’ on these issues.  There is no “I support the law and lawlessness at the same time.”  By definition, such a position is lawlessness — especially when we are discussing Natural Law (as we are now).  So, when it comes to the TEA Party agenda, which are you: for them, or for Tyranny, Slavery, Lawlessness and Licentiousness?  Think I am wrong?  Then read this post and then tell me if you still think I’m wrong. Continue reading PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL LAW: You are either Pro TEA Party, or You are Pro Tyranny (there’s no ‘middle ground’ on this issue) →