For far too long, the Courts have been used to subvert our Constitution. This is the opposite of what they are charged with doing and it is time to end it — NOW!
Here are just a few of the stories that caught my attention:
BREAKING: Judge Issues Nationwide Injunction Against Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
BREAKING: Biden-Appointed Judge Blocks Trump Federal Spending Freeze
Judge Blocks Trump’s Order Pulling Transgender Inmates from Women’s Prisons
OK, I think it is time for a lesson in Constitutional law.
1 — There are three (3) branches to our Federal Government: the Legislative (Congress), the Executive (President) and the Judicial (Courts).
2 — They are co-equal, which means one branch cannot tell another how to run itself. It also means that each branch is equal in its authority to decide what is and what is not legal.
3 — The habit of suing one branch so that the court can then dictate to it is not constitutional! If it were, then the Founders would have said it was supreme to the other branches. But, as it is, the Founders said the Judicial Branch had the power to declare something constitutional or unconstitutional, but not to stop another branch that is equal in its authority to decide the same matter from what it deems to be lawful execution of its constitutional authority.
So, let me explain what this means once you do the math:
1 — The Federal Court(s) can tell the Congress a law is unconstitutional, but the Court cannot change the law in any way — because the Court does not have the power to create law.
2 — The Courts can declare a Presidential action to be unconstitutional, but — so long as that action resides entirely within the operation of the Executive Branch (to include all its many divisions), the Court has no authority to stop that action. That would fall on the Congress by way of legislation (and possible veto over-ride) or impeachment.
This is how our system was designed to work. However, the Progressives — Republicans first under Teddy Roosevelt then Democrats under Woodrow Wilson — changed this. What’s more, they changed it without Amending the Constitution. This means that the practice of Federal Courts dictating to the Executive is unconstitutional and must stop — NOW!
It also means every one of the judges in the stories I posted above should be impeached, removed from office, dis-barred and forbidden to practice law or serve in public office ever again. This is because, in each of the stories I posted, the judges are halting the legitimate operations of the Executive branch, and the Court(s) have no Constitutional authority to do that.
Either we return to the rule of law, or we accept that we are all just siding eith our favorite dictator/Party.
–B3A
History of judges being impeached is very rare. Bringing lawsuits against an Executive Order doesn’t qualify for impeachment of the judge. Congress has to pass a new law allowing for an investigation of judges who allow frivolous political lawfare lawsuits. They would also have to define what is frivolous political lawfare which involves political bias.
The people’s vote seems to have the last say of what lawfare is or is not, as was seen in the last election. Lawfare seems to be here to stay and for now only through elections can limited corrections be made to stop the abuses.
Judges were routinely impeached under the common law were inherited from England — when they went bad. We just don’t do it anymore. Additionally, there is no need for a law against judges. The Executive just needs to ignore these rulings. The plaintiffs have no standing in the first place. If they did, then why can’t any of us sue the Biden Administration over COVID mandates, of US AID, or any of their many other policies? As Obama said, elections have consequences.
The final word on this is simple. The President has 100% authority to run his branch of the government as he sees fit and, if the Courts and Congress think he is acting illegally, they impeach him. Other than that, the Court has no jurisdiction here. If it did, it would not be equal to the Executive, it would be above it.
What we see here is EXACTLY what Jefferson said would happen if we allowed the Court to take on a role for which it was never authorized — and we have. So…