I have a question: Are we electing the President the way the U.S. Constitution prescribes? Or are we in open violation of constitutional law?
Continue reading Are We Electing the President as Constitutional Prescribed?
Category Archives: THE CONSTITUTION
The U.S. Constitution Has ALWAYS Mandated A 1-Day Election
The following story comes as a breath of fresh air to me:
Continue reading The U.S. Constitution Has ALWAYS Mandated A 1-Day Election
SCOTUS Misses The Mark On Abortion — AGAIN!
BY now, most of you have heard that Roe vs. Wade has been shot down. Good! It deserved to be — because it was bad law. But so is this latest ruling. Once again, the SCOTUS has tried to pass-off on the real issue: defining life.
Look, I have written about this before. You can find the post here:
There Is Not Now, Nor Has There EVER Been A ‘Right’ To Murder An Unborn Child — AND I CAN PROVE IT!
This is a very simple issue — if we would only return to originalist thinking (like the Founders said we are supposed to use when ‘interpreting’ the Constitution).
1st — Ultimately, the Right to life is found in the Declaration of Independence, which is our founding document and carries the weight of law. This is not B3A’s opinion; it is the direct assertion of the Founders! So, it is not open to debate, and the only ones who claim otherwise are those who wish to subvert the foundation of our government.
2nd — Even if we refuse to address the Declaration, then we have the Bill of Rights. When was the last time you read this?
Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The unborn child is a human being with an individual Right to their life. As such, the Federal government has a duty to protect the unborn’s life. It is not the woman’s body. This is by definition. So, in order to justify the taking of that child’s life, the woman has to be able to show a compelling need that would also justify the taking of a life from a random person picked off the street. This is the measuring stick against which the woman has to make her case; not the fallacious claim of ‘my body, my choice.’
One more thing: if you think that the unborn is not a human under our laws, you need to return to the Founders. They counted the unborn as a human life from the point of the quickening. They used this point because it was the first sure sign they had in their day that the woman was pregnant. We cannot know if they would have assigned personhood from the first moment ya pregnancy test shows the woman is pregnant, but we can readily infer that they considered an unborn person to be a human life which, according to the Declaration, imparts a right to that life from the moment of creation (‘created equal, and with the inalienable right to life…’).
There! I just wrote the Constitutional opinion the SCOTU still refuses to write, and it is 100% within the Founders’ frame work of the Declaration and Constitution.
There Is Not Now, Nor Has There EVER Been A ‘Right’ To Murder An Unborn Child — AND I CAN PROVE IT!
With the recent SCOTUS ruling ending Roe vs Wade and sending the issue of abortion back to the States, I think it is time that we understand this simple fact:
There Is Not Now, Nor Has There EVER Been A ‘Right’ To Murder An Unborn Child!
This is 100% fact, and every lawyer who has bothered to study the Founders knows this. I will now prove it. Stay with me, this will not take long.
“Before the formation of this Constitution, it had been affirmed as a self-evident truth, in the declaration of Independence, very deliberately made by the Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled that, “all men are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” This declaration of Independence was received and ratified by all the States in the Union and has never been disannulled. May we not from hence conclude, that the doctrine of Liberty and Equality is an article in the political creed of the United States.”
– Samuel Adams, United States Founding Father, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, “Father of the American Revolution”, Governor of Massachusetts, “The Writings of Samuel Adams”, Harry Alonzo Cushing, editor (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1908), Vol. IV, p. 357, to the Legislature of Massachusetts on January 17, 1794.
Why does this matter? Because a key player in the creation of this nation, the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution said that the Declaration is our founding document, not the Constitution. What’s more, according to Sam Adams, if the Declaration has not been disannulled (and it hasn’t, it’s only been severed from the Constitution), then it is still in force. Which means this clause is law, and even a first grader can understand what it means:
“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,…”
FULL STOP! Right there, in our founding document, we see that we are created with the Right to life — period! Creation is the moment of conception, therefore, this ends the debate. But I will go one further, to provide a second witness:
“Human life from its commencement to its close is protected by the common law. In the contemplations of law life begins when the infant is fist able to stir in the womb by the law is protected.”
— James Wilson, signer of the Declaration and Constitution
There you go: abortion would have been considered murder by our Founders. But wait! You say this allows abortion up to the point where the child first starts to move? Wrong! The reason this is the point stated by the Founders is because — in their time — this was the earliest you could be sure you were pregnant. You see, they did not have early pregnancy tests back then. So, they set the point where it was clear that a woman was with child: the quickening.
There you go: a proof so simple a child can understand it.
The Declaration of Independence is our founding document and it carries the weight of law.
The Declaration states that Rights are granted by God, and that the Right to life begins at the moment of conception (creation).
Common law recognizes the unborn as a person and protects the child’s life while still in the womb.
Now, please, stop trying to justify murder! And stop saying that you have a right over your own body: the unborn child is not your body. If you cannot be responsible for your actions, then do not have sex!
Otherwise, accept it: you want to be allowed to murder an innocent child, and you do not want to be judged for your irresponsible behaviors, but you also want others to tell you you are the victim and to even pay for your evil acts. NO! I will do none of that!
Now, STOP THIS LAWLESSNESS!
Either abstain from sex, or accept the responsibility for your actions. Just don’t claim you have a right to murder an innocent person.
[NOTE: YES! I am saying that all the lawyers who disagree with this post are wrong! NO! I do not need a law degree to say so! The Supreme Court knows this is all true, and if they don’t, then they are not qualified to hold their seat. The Court is not stupid; they just don’t care. The truth is simple: there are so few people left in our legal system who actually know what a fact is — let alone how to find them; and so few people who know what an oath is — let alone bother to keep theirs — that it is seen as an act of subversion when a principled officer of the law states facts and defends the law. So many of our ‘debates’ could be ended if we were to just read the Founders’ words and stop with what they said. But then, this would not allow the tyrants among us any room to subvert and destroy this nation, so we can’t have anything like that — not so long as they have power…]