What follows was sent to me by a reader. I have gone through it and I can follow what the author is saying. If this is correct (and I suspect it is), then the jabs must be stopped now! Read the following and you’ll see why.
The primary article is by Karl Denninger* (if you do not know who he is, please, click the link and familiarize yourself with him so you can better judge his credibility).
Here is the story (warning: he uses some colorful language, but when you see why, you might be willing to forgive him):
What the HELL is going on here?
THESE SHOTS MUST BE WITHDRAWN NOW until what has happened is fully explained and, if applicable, accountability is obtained for those injured or killed as a result. If embargoing of reports is proved, and its entirely possible that is the case, everyone involved must go to prison now and the entire program must be permanently scrapped.
THERE IS NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THIS DATA THAT REDUCES TO RANDOM CHANCE.
Here is a link to the article that cause Mr Denninger to write the article I just posted:
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
I have a very good idea of what is going on here, but I will keep my position to myself — for now. For the time being, I will just leave you to digest this information and decide what you think it means for yourself. You’re smart enough to figure this out, just read the information carefully, then try to think of an ‘innocent’ explanation for the data that has been reported by the U.S. Government. If you cannot think of such an explanation,… Well, then, Ockham’s Razor will put you firmly inside the thought process I am keeping to myself — for now 😉
* Please note that I am very skeptical of Wikipedia. However, when it comes to matters such as these, there are generally very few reliable sources on the first few pages of anything connected to a Google search. Wikipedia is notably one of the worst, but it does have the benefit of at least hitting the main points of just about any issue. Therefore, if the reader is aware that Wikipedia is most likely providing a generally accurate outline with a decidedly anti-America, anti-Christian bias, it can be used as a rough guide to launch a more serious study of the material. This is the only reason I have linked to it in this post.